“…Molecular based phylogenetic investigations are uncovering unexpected relationships and unanticipated numbers of distinct taxa (reviewed by Kitahara et al, 2016;Cowman et al, 2020), and similarly, multilocus population genetic surveys routinely find distinct genetic taxa within morphologically defined taxonomic species. These so-called cryptic species (recent reported genomic examples include: Gomez-Corrales & Prada, 2020; Underwood et al, 2020;Wepfer et al, 2020;Bongaerts et al, 2021a;Feldman et al, 2021;Fifer et al, 2021;Rippe et al, 2021;Zayasu et al, 2021;Adam et al, 2022;Prata et al, 2022;Rivera et al, 2022;Matias et al, 2023;Voolstra et al, 2023;Meziere et al, 2024) reinforce observations previously made with microsatellites and few nuclear markers (such as Bongaerts et al, 2010;Souter, 2010;Ladner & Palumbi, 2012;Schmidt-Roach et al, 2012;Prada & Hellberg, 2013;Boulay et al, 2014;Warner, van Oppen & Willis, 2015;Gélin et al, 2017) and demonstrate how species designations based on morphology alone can underestimate true community diversity (Fig 1). Indeed, most conservation management and restoration plans implicitly assume that coral species are recognisable and biologically valid entities (Baums, 2008;Anthony et al, 2017;National Academies of Sciences, 2018;Colton et al, 2022).…”