Family Medicine 2016
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-04414-9_74
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disorders of the Peripheral Nervous System

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the child was older than the limit age for the 95% of population passing the item, and did not pass it, the item was counted as a “Delay”. The counting of caution and delayed items is used to determine risk or developmental delay status [ 29 ]. For nominal classification, children with ≥1 Delay or ≥2 Cautions were classified as “At risk”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If the child was older than the limit age for the 95% of population passing the item, and did not pass it, the item was counted as a “Delay”. The counting of caution and delayed items is used to determine risk or developmental delay status [ 29 ]. For nominal classification, children with ≥1 Delay or ≥2 Cautions were classified as “At risk”.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An administration of test analysis requires comparing caregiver reports with direct child observation. Vitrikas et al [ 29 ] described both a parent-completed EDS tool as an instrument for obtaining screening information through parent participation, and (as a separate instrument) a directly administered EDS tool where information is based on direct observation of the child by a physician or other expert. To probe the potential of an EDS tool to improve the outlook of at-risk children in conditions of poverty in LMICs, the current study describes the use of a parent-administered report of direct observation and activities for children between 36 and 59 months of age.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though the AAP endorses screening for developmental concerns; autism spectrum disorder; tobacco, alcohol, or drug use; and depression, the AAFP does not have the same guidelines. The AAFP (2020) overview of guidelines aligns with the USPSTF to give these areas of screening a recommendation of “I,” which signifies there is insufficient evidence to assess the benefits versus harm for this service, evidence is lacking, or poor quality or conflicting research (Siu, 2015; Vitrikas et al, 2017). The differences in recommendations between the AAP and the AAFP likely have an impact on the screening practices of pediatricians and family physicians.…”
Section: Challenges In Rural Settingsmentioning
confidence: 99%