2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.rboe.2017.04.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disorders of the long head of the biceps: tenotomy versus tenodesis

Abstract: Disorders of the long head of biceps tendon are common in clinical practice. Their causes could be degenerative, inflammatory, instability (subluxation or luxation) or traumatic. They are generally associated to other diseases of the shoulder, mainly rotator cuff injuries. Currently, there is controversy in the literature regarding the indications for surgical treatment and the choice of the best technique for each case, due to the possibility of esthetic deformity, loss of muscle strength, and residual pain.T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Hitchcock and Bechtol found that the bicipital groove is shallow with a medial wall angle less than 45° in 8% of patients, and they believed that this corresponded with Meyer’s observation of a medial LHB tendon dislocation in 8% of his cadavers. 16 , 17 This finding was also supported by Lafosse et al. who stated that a decreased lesser tuberosity angle can facilitate medial subluxation or dislocation of the LHB tendon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Hitchcock and Bechtol found that the bicipital groove is shallow with a medial wall angle less than 45° in 8% of patients, and they believed that this corresponded with Meyer’s observation of a medial LHB tendon dislocation in 8% of his cadavers. 16 , 17 This finding was also supported by Lafosse et al. who stated that a decreased lesser tuberosity angle can facilitate medial subluxation or dislocation of the LHB tendon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Recent evidence and reviews have not shown a significant difference in strength and outcomes when comparing tenodesis versus tenotomy; however, there have been reports of higher rates of Popeye deformity after tenotomy. 5 , 9 , 10 , 18 , 19 According to Galdi et al, 7 patients have strong preferences for which procedure they undergo. Significant patient concerns are the fear of cosmetic (Popeye) deformities, continued pain, dysfunction in strength or endurance, and recovery time.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, keyhole xation may fail due to low primary stability [34], knot pullout [35], and excess tension [36]. The interference screw technique may lead to screw loosening [37] and tendon concis [32] because of proximal cancellous bone and tendon-bone extrusion [32], and the length-tension relationship is di cult to control with this technique [38,39]. The traditional single anchor xation technique may not offer adequate stabilization of the tendon, and the construct strength may be poor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%