2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.carbon.2013.02.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disorder in ball-milled graphite revealed by Raman spectroscopy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

8
95
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 173 publications
(104 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
8
95
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar observation was also made by Posudievsky and coworkers synthesizing graphene oxide by a mechanochemical treatment of graphite [37]. Corresponding to the work of Xing and coworkers, who investigated the disorder of graphite caused by mechanochemistry under an inert atmosphere, we assume that the disordering of CB under air is more pronounced and takes already place with shorter milling time of 2 h [38]. This leads to the broadening of the D and G bands.…”
Section: Impact Of Mechanochemical Treatment On the Textural Propertimentioning
confidence: 61%
“…A similar observation was also made by Posudievsky and coworkers synthesizing graphene oxide by a mechanochemical treatment of graphite [37]. Corresponding to the work of Xing and coworkers, who investigated the disorder of graphite caused by mechanochemistry under an inert atmosphere, we assume that the disordering of CB under air is more pronounced and takes already place with shorter milling time of 2 h [38]. This leads to the broadening of the D and G bands.…”
Section: Impact Of Mechanochemical Treatment On the Textural Propertimentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The D and G bands in the composite C-2 have much larger FWHMs comparing with those in the composite C-1, which reveals a more disordered in-plane structure. 25,26 For example, the FWHM of the D band is 120 cm -1 for the composite C-2, comparing with only 70 cm -1 in the composite C-1, indicating a much higher degree of in-plane distortion and disordering in the graphitic structure in the composite C-2. For example, the FWHM of the D band is 120 cm -1 for the composite C-2, comparing with only 70 cm -1 in the composite C-1, indicating a much higher degree of in-plane distortion and disordering in the graphitic structure in the composite C-2.…”
Section: Characterisation Of Samplesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In contrast, low friction in an oxygen or water vapour environment is often reported [6][7][8]. Moreover, low friction in graphite is due to the passivation of dangling bonds by reactive gases [7][8][9][10][11][12][13]. In argon environment, super low value of friction coefficient in turbostratic graphite is attributed to self-organization and superficial mobility of crystallites at contact interface [9].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%