2018
DOI: 10.21873/invivo.11309
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disodium Cromolyn and Anti-podoplanin Antibodies Strongly Inhibit Growth of BHK 21/C13-derived Fibrosarcoma in a Chick Embryo Chorioallantoic Membrane Model

Abstract: Abstract. Aim: To characterize baby hamster kidney fibroblast (BHK 21/C13) cells and test the effects of antibodies against podoplanin and disodium cromolyn on BHK 21/C13 cell line-derived tumors grown on chick embryo chorioallantoic membrane (CAM). Material and MethodsExperimental models are still powerful tools for medical research. In vitro and in vivo models are designed to help researchers in their work for understanding disease mechanisms and for the discovery and testing of new therapeutics which by the… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In vivo , the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay is a valuable option due to its low costs and relatively easy implementation. CAM assays have been employed to study sarcoma angiogenesis, fibroblast infiltration, tumorigenesis, tumor invasion, and metastasis in CHS, EwS, fibrosarcoma, LPS, and OS (Sys et al , 2013; Patil et al , 2014; Manjunathan & Ragunathan, 2015; Cimpean et al , 2018; Kunz et al , 2019; Perut et al , 2019; Steinestel et al , 2020). Numerous additional in vivo models of inducible or spontaneous sarcomas have been described in non‐mammalian vertebrates (e.g., zebrafish; Leacock et al , 2012; Mohseny et al , 2012; Brown et al , 2017b; Hayes & Langenau, 2017; Ignatius et al , 2018; Fleming et al , 2019) and in mammalians (e.g., mouse, rat, and dog; Cannon, 2015; Jacques et al , 2018; Castillo‐Tandazo et al , 2019; Pomella & Rota, 2020).…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Sarcomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In vivo , the chick chorioallantoic membrane (CAM) assay is a valuable option due to its low costs and relatively easy implementation. CAM assays have been employed to study sarcoma angiogenesis, fibroblast infiltration, tumorigenesis, tumor invasion, and metastasis in CHS, EwS, fibrosarcoma, LPS, and OS (Sys et al , 2013; Patil et al , 2014; Manjunathan & Ragunathan, 2015; Cimpean et al , 2018; Kunz et al , 2019; Perut et al , 2019; Steinestel et al , 2020). Numerous additional in vivo models of inducible or spontaneous sarcomas have been described in non‐mammalian vertebrates (e.g., zebrafish; Leacock et al , 2012; Mohseny et al , 2012; Brown et al , 2017b; Hayes & Langenau, 2017; Ignatius et al , 2018; Fleming et al , 2019) and in mammalians (e.g., mouse, rat, and dog; Cannon, 2015; Jacques et al , 2018; Castillo‐Tandazo et al , 2019; Pomella & Rota, 2020).…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Sarcomamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, CAM is an embryonic tissue lacking an immune system and having mesenchymal cells with stem like potential able to differentiate depending on a specific microenvironment [15,16]. Based on the previously described features, CAM is a reliable in vivo model for testing the behavior of normal and pathologic tissues (as cultured cells or malignant tumors) [17,18], of different drugs and antibodies [19,20], or of a variety of biomaterials implanted on its surface [21,22]. There is minimal data available regarding bone implants on CAM [23,24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Staining for S-100 coupled with calretinin and PGP9.5 immunostaining performed on suction rectal biopsies was shown to be sensitive and specific for diagnosing HD (12). However, S-100 was found to be positive in ovarian cancer (13), metastases to the small intestine (14) and fibrosarcoma cells (15). The other marker, CD56, was used in evaluating a "transition zone" proximally to the aganglionic segment, with the use of serial colonic wall biopsies and obtained very good results (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%