1982
DOI: 10.1080/01418618208236915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dislocation loops at twin boundaries in an ion-irradiated austenitic alloy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The microstructure after irradiation up to 10.2 dpa was the subject of previous studies [39,40,44]. The irradiated microstructure consisted of Frank dislocation loops and fine-scale precipitates typical of neutron irradiations at the temperature investigated [58][59][60][61]. To summarize, the loop size increased while the density decreased with increasing dose [39].…”
Section: Dislocations and Frank Loopsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…The microstructure after irradiation up to 10.2 dpa was the subject of previous studies [39,40,44]. The irradiated microstructure consisted of Frank dislocation loops and fine-scale precipitates typical of neutron irradiations at the temperature investigated [58][59][60][61]. To summarize, the loop size increased while the density decreased with increasing dose [39].…”
Section: Dislocations and Frank Loopsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…It has been repoi ted that defects introduced in austenitic steels by high-energy particle irradiation are Frank loops of interstitial type lying on a { 1 1 l } plane (Holmes, R )bbins, Brimhall and Mastel 1968, Lane andGoodhew 1982, Garner andGelles 1988). As seen in fig.…”
Section: Dislocation Loops In An As-irradiated Specimenmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…For extrinsic Frank loops, which have two layers of stacking faults, it has been suggested that unfaulting may occur by the motion of two Shockley partial dislocations (Barnes 1961, Nabarro 1967, Hirth and Lothe 1968, Lane and Goodhew 1982, Jitsukawa, Katano and Shiraishi 1984. The dislocation reaction involved in conversion from the Frank loop to a perfect loop is given by a a --a 3 6 6 2 -[ i i i l +~ [mi+-[1211+-[iio].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%