2020
DOI: 10.1088/1361-651x/ab602e
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Dislocation density informed eigenstrain based reduced order homogenization modeling: verification and application on a titanium alloy structure subjected to cyclic loading

Abstract: This manuscript presents a dislocation density informed eigenstrain based reduced order homogenization model (DD-EHM), and its application on a titanium alloy structure subjected to cyclic loading. The eigenstrain based reduced order homogenization (EHM) approach has been extended to account for the presence of HCP (primary α phase) and BCC (β phase) grains, within which the deformation process is modeled using a dislocation density based crystal plasticity formulation. DD-EHM has been thoroughly verified to a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 88 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Here, the p = 0.8 is chosen to obtain the relatively low dislocation debris density 49 for near-α titanium alloys from the TEM observations. 27 k κ 1 and k κ 2 are the dislocation generating coefficient and the annihilation coefficient due to dynamic recovery, respectively and their relationship have been reported in Liu et al 30 The evolution of reversible forest dislocations are expressed as a function of the local resolved shear stress where symbol {} is the Macaulay brackets. ρ κ 0 is the value of the total dislocation density at the point of load reversal, and b m is the dislocation density recombination coefficient taken to be 0.4 for HCP and BCC crystals.…”
Section: A P P End I X a : Reversal Dislocation Evolution In Cpmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Here, the p = 0.8 is chosen to obtain the relatively low dislocation debris density 49 for near-α titanium alloys from the TEM observations. 27 k κ 1 and k κ 2 are the dislocation generating coefficient and the annihilation coefficient due to dynamic recovery, respectively and their relationship have been reported in Liu et al 30 The evolution of reversible forest dislocations are expressed as a function of the local resolved shear stress where symbol {} is the Macaulay brackets. ρ κ 0 is the value of the total dislocation density at the point of load reversal, and b m is the dislocation density recombination coefficient taken to be 0.4 for HCP and BCC crystals.…”
Section: A P P End I X a : Reversal Dislocation Evolution In Cpmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Here, the reversible dislocation is accounted for now to describe the back stress in the strength hardening rule for capturing the Bauschinger effect, which shows good prediction of heterosis loop. 30 Intrinsically during load reversal, partial stored dislocation is erased and is independent of the dislocation structure formed by the irreversible forest dislocations. 49 To incorporate the intrinsic dislocation interaction during load reversal, the forest dislocation density are divided into two parts, that is, forward (irreversible) forest dislocation ρ κ fwd and reversible dislocation ρ κAE rev 30,49 :…”
Section: Crystal Plasticity Framework Incorporating Reversible Disloc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations