Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Multimedia Computing and Systems
DOI: 10.1109/mmcs.1999.778459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disk scheduling with quality of service guarantees

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
79
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such management can be embedded in the shared storage resource's internal scheduler (e.g., disk schedulers) (Cello [24], Stonehenge [25], YFQ [26], PVFS [27]), which has direct control over the resource but requires the internal scheduler to be accessible and modifiable. The management can also be implemented via virtualization by interposing a layer between clients and their shared storage resources (Faç ade [17], SLEDS [18], SFQ(D) [6], GVFS [19]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such management can be embedded in the shared storage resource's internal scheduler (e.g., disk schedulers) (Cello [24], Stonehenge [25], YFQ [26], PVFS [27]), which has direct control over the resource but requires the internal scheduler to be accessible and modifiable. The management can also be implemented via virtualization by interposing a layer between clients and their shared storage resources (Faç ade [17], SLEDS [18], SFQ(D) [6], GVFS [19]).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of this class of schedulers, we describe here YFQ (Yet another Fair Queueing), proposed by Bruno et al in [6]. It serves requests in batches; the requests belonging to each batch are chosen using WFQ [4], and can be sorted using a SCAN or C-LOOK discipline in order to improve the disk throughput.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To address the similar problem in the domain of storage, various adaptations of these algorithms have been proposed. For example, YFQ [11], SFQ(D) [5] are based on Start-time Fair Queue (SFQ) [12]; SLEDS [13] and SARC [14] are adaptations of the leaky bucket algorithm; CVC [15] [4] adopts VirtualClock [7]. However, directly applying fair queuing-based algorithm to storage system can introduce unfairness within a short period of time (Section II-C).…”
Section: Overview and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%