1964
DOI: 10.4064/fm-55-3-199-214
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disjoint mappings and the span of spaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

1984
1984
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The span σ(/) of a 162 A. LELEK mapping / was originally defined by Ingram [3], while the present author earlier introduced the span σ(X) and, subsequently, the other types of these quantities for metric spaces (see [6] and [7]). It is known that, for some particular spaces, neither two of these four types of spans need to be equal (see [7] and [8]).…”
Section: (C a ) K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The span σ(/) of a 162 A. LELEK mapping / was originally defined by Ingram [3], while the present author earlier introduced the span σ(X) and, subsequently, the other types of these quantities for metric spaces (see [6] and [7]). It is known that, for some particular spaces, neither two of these four types of spans need to be equal (see [7] and [8]).…”
Section: (C a ) K)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We utilize the following theorem from [3] in the proof of Corollary 2. Theorem L: If Y is a closed subset of the Hilbert cube I ω and ρ : Y → S is an essential mapping of Y onto the circumference S, then…”
Section: Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to (2), the centers of these balls are of distance greater than or equal to w(T') from each other. Thus these three balls are pairwise disjoint closed subsets of T, and there exists a number r\ > 0 such that if x, y G T and the points x, y belong to two different balls 50,5i,i?2, then d(x,y) > n. Let 6¿ denote the endpoint of the arc L = L¿ different from v, so that a% G L and bt may coincide with o¿, but not necessarily.…”
Section: Theorem Ift' Ct Are Simple Triods Then A*(t) > W(t')/2mentioning
confidence: 99%