2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinph.2014.09.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disinhibitory shift of recovery curve of somatosensory-evoked response in elderly: A magnetoencephalographic study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the Lenz study used peak-to-peak differences (N20 to P25) to compute gating ratios, and a very short inter-stimulation interval of 30 ms, both of which are very different than the current study and those of Cheng and Lin (2013)and Cheng, Chan, Baillet et al (2015). Finally, there is also data suggesting that age-related gating effects in the time-domain are only present when the interstimulation interval is less than 200 ms (Goto et al 2015), which could explain our findings and those of Cheng, Chan, Baillet et al 2015. Unfortunately, no studies to date have evaluated gamma range activity in the context of gating and aging, and thus we cannot comment on whether the inter-stimulation interval affects such gating responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, the Lenz study used peak-to-peak differences (N20 to P25) to compute gating ratios, and a very short inter-stimulation interval of 30 ms, both of which are very different than the current study and those of Cheng and Lin (2013)and Cheng, Chan, Baillet et al (2015). Finally, there is also data suggesting that age-related gating effects in the time-domain are only present when the interstimulation interval is less than 200 ms (Goto et al 2015), which could explain our findings and those of Cheng, Chan, Baillet et al 2015. Unfortunately, no studies to date have evaluated gamma range activity in the context of gating and aging, and thus we cannot comment on whether the inter-stimulation interval affects such gating responses.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…For example, studies using electrical paired-pulse stimulation paradigms have shown robust sensory gating following median nerve stimulation in healthy adults (Hsiao et al 2013;Cheng, Chan, Niddam et al 2016), as well as reduced sensory gating in healthy older relative to younger adults using the same paradigm (Lenz et al 2012;Cheng and Lin 2013). Likewise, another healthy aging study found that older adults had reduced gating relative to younger adults when the paired electrical pulses were temporally separated by 100 ms or less, but that the 2 groups gated roughly equally when the pulses were 200 ms apart (Goto et al 2015). These data may suggest that older adults have altered inhibitory function, which leads to aberrant gating when stimuli are presented in rapid succession and normal gating at longer temporal intervals.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…139,144-145 Interestingly, similar age-related differences have been reported in somatosensory MEG studies utilizing median nerve stimulation, with older adults exhibiting an increased early cortical response in the primary somatosensory cortices, 146-151 especially contralateral to the stimulated nerve. 146-150 Of note, neural responses at later latencies are typically more comparable in strength and do not generally show aging effects in auditory or somatosensory modalities, although there have been exceptions. 138,141 Together these studies suggest that early hyper-responsivity to sensory stimulation in the elderly may underlie age-related behavioral deficits in sensory processing.…”
Section: Healthy Agingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In human studies, drug-related PPD changes have shown that GABA is related to PPD (Huttunen et al 2008 ; Stude et al 2016 ). Moreover, PPD is reduced in elderly people (Goto et al 2015 ; Lenz et al 2012 ), and GABA concentrations decrease with age (Grachev et al 2001 ). In addition, PPD induced by somatosensory stimulation is related to the degradation of tactile perception (Lenz et al 2012 ; Rocchi et al 2017 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%