Abstract:Second-screening and live-tweeting alongside broadcast television generates new concerns with respect to online abuse. We present an investigation into the nature of Twitter-facilitated second-screening posts relating to Thelma's Gypsy Girls, one of a series of controversial documentary programmes portraying the Irish Traveller community that have recently been aired by the UK publicservice television broadcaster Channel 4. Sentiment analysis highlighted the general negativity of these posts whilst a detailed … Show more
“…Similar calls for symbolic punishment have also been observed in other online hate contexts (e.g. Angie et al, 2011;Coffey & Woolworth, 2004;Doughty et al, 2014;Erjavec & Kovačič, 2012). Some posters' attempts to counter Emma's apparent racism with further expressions of hatred (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Some posters' attempts to counter Emma's apparent racism with further expressions of hatred (i.e. Meeting hatred with hatred) seem to be in line with existing 'flaming' research (Coffey & Woolworth, 2004;Doughty et al, 2014, Lange, 2007Moor et al, 2010). In particular, there was some evidence of 'flaming' (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…anti-social, abusive, negative, aggressive and hostile tweets -a phenomenon frequently referred to as 'flaming ' (O'Sullivan & Flanagin, 2003;Suler, 2004;Turnage, 2008). In Doughty et al's (2014) study 'flaming', which is described as a negative aspect of the ODE, tended to be directed at the individuals or specific communities depicted in these broadcasts. In addition, Lange (2007) and Moor, Heuvelman, and Verleur (2010) investigated possible causes of 'flaming' behaviour on YouTube and found that people predominantly 'flamed' to express their disagreement with certain video or comment content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Further, Doughty, Lawson, Linehan, Rowland, and Bennett (2014) found that controversial television broadcasts elicited many polarised (i.e. anti-social, abusive, negative, aggressive and hostile tweets -a phenomenon frequently referred to as 'flaming ' (O'Sullivan & Flanagin, 2003;Suler, 2004;Turnage, 2008).…”
“…Similar calls for symbolic punishment have also been observed in other online hate contexts (e.g. Angie et al, 2011;Coffey & Woolworth, 2004;Doughty et al, 2014;Erjavec & Kovačič, 2012). Some posters' attempts to counter Emma's apparent racism with further expressions of hatred (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 59%
“…Some posters' attempts to counter Emma's apparent racism with further expressions of hatred (i.e. Meeting hatred with hatred) seem to be in line with existing 'flaming' research (Coffey & Woolworth, 2004;Doughty et al, 2014, Lange, 2007Moor et al, 2010). In particular, there was some evidence of 'flaming' (i.e.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 52%
“…anti-social, abusive, negative, aggressive and hostile tweets -a phenomenon frequently referred to as 'flaming ' (O'Sullivan & Flanagin, 2003;Suler, 2004;Turnage, 2008). In Doughty et al's (2014) study 'flaming', which is described as a negative aspect of the ODE, tended to be directed at the individuals or specific communities depicted in these broadcasts. In addition, Lange (2007) and Moor, Heuvelman, and Verleur (2010) investigated possible causes of 'flaming' behaviour on YouTube and found that people predominantly 'flamed' to express their disagreement with certain video or comment content.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Further, Doughty, Lawson, Linehan, Rowland, and Bennett (2014) found that controversial television broadcasts elicited many polarised (i.e. anti-social, abusive, negative, aggressive and hostile tweets -a phenomenon frequently referred to as 'flaming ' (O'Sullivan & Flanagin, 2003;Suler, 2004;Turnage, 2008).…”
“…The social TV cluster investigates what motivates audiences to engage in online commenting via social media and how these audiences are internally diversified (Doughty, Lawson, Linehan, Rowland & Bennett, 2014), and on how online conversation patterns can vary across various types of TV shows (Mukherjee, Wong & Jansen, 2014) or within TV shows (Giglietto & Selva, 2014). The media experience cluster studies to what extent the TV viewing experience is impacted by the additional second screen (Kusumoto, Kinnunen, Kätsyri, Lindroos & Oittinen, 2014;Murphy & Hughes, 2014;Van Cauwenberge, Schaap & van Roy, 2014).…”
Second screen applications are among the latest of the TV industry's innovations to retain the TV viewer's attention in a challenging multi-screen environment. These applications can be regarded as an extension of TV content consumed on a TV set towards lightweight portable devices such as tablets. While numerous commercial instances are available internationally and the existing literature on the topic from a technical perspective is extensive, the audience side of this phenomenon has been paid far less attention to. Moreover, in the case of Flanders, the successful commercial implementation of second screen applications remains limited. In this research, we aim to elicit what TV viewers' expectations and preferences are regarding second screen functionalities. By applying means-end theory and a laddering approach we were able to discern how these preferences subsequently relate to the TV show itself, the consequences for the viewing experience, as well as how second screen applications and usages are expected to fit in the viewer's everyday life. their strategy focuses on following the viewers' gaze, rather than trying to redirect them to the TV screen.Our aim is to grasp what TV viewers' expectations are regarding second screen applications' functionalities. More in particular we will focus on how these link up to TV viewers' expectations on the consequences that these properties have for their viewing experience and what they personally value in their everyday life. The research question we maintained was "How can a second screen application be relevant for TV viewers as a companion application?" Second screen applications today exist in different forms, aimed at enhancing the viewing experience, stimulating the viewer to search for additional and related content, and reviving the idea of social TV by integrating existing (e
This paper presents an empirical investigation of how people appropriated Twitter for socio-political talk in response to a television (TV) portrayal of people supported by state welfare and benefits. Our findings reveal how online discussion during, and in-between, TV broadcasts was characterised by distinctly different qualities, topics and user behaviours. These findings offer design opportunities for social media services to (i) support more balanced real-time commentaries of politically-charged media, (ii) actively promote discussion to continue after, and between, programming; and (iii) incorporate different motivations and attitudes towards socio-political concerns, as well as different practices of communicating those concerns. We contribute to the developing HCI literature on how social media intersects with political and civic engagement and specifically highlight the ways in which Twitter interacts with other forms of media as a site of everyday socio-political talk and debate.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.