2020
DOI: 10.1177/1065912920938143
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disinformation as a Threat to Deliberative Democracy

Abstract: It is frequently claimed that online disinformation threatens democracy, and that disinformation is more prevalent or harmful because social media platforms have disrupted our communication systems. These intuitions have not been fully developed in democratic theory. This article builds on systemic approaches to deliberative democracy to characterize key vulnerabilities of social media platforms that disinformation actors exploit, and to clarify potential anti-deliberative effects of disinformation. T… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
54
1
5

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 126 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 63 publications
2
54
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding ideological self-positioning, some studies agreed that the American right-wing is substantially more vulnerable to disinformation attacks, and more likely to accept them, than the left-wing. It is an 'ideological asymmetry' , showed in two different dimensions: First, the content dimension, wherein disinformation providers produce vastly more conservative-oriented messages than liberal ones (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017;Howard, Ganesh, Liotsiou, Kelly, & Francois, 2018;Mckay & Tenove, 2020); second, the reception dimension, showing that conservatives are also more likely to engage with the disinformation messages that target them than liberals (Grinberg, Joseph, Friedland, Swire-Thompson, & Lazer, 2019;Hjorth & Adler-Nissen, 2019).…”
Section: Factors That Influence Disinformation Receptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Regarding ideological self-positioning, some studies agreed that the American right-wing is substantially more vulnerable to disinformation attacks, and more likely to accept them, than the left-wing. It is an 'ideological asymmetry' , showed in two different dimensions: First, the content dimension, wherein disinformation providers produce vastly more conservative-oriented messages than liberal ones (Allcott & Gentzkow, 2017;Howard, Ganesh, Liotsiou, Kelly, & Francois, 2018;Mckay & Tenove, 2020); second, the reception dimension, showing that conservatives are also more likely to engage with the disinformation messages that target them than liberals (Grinberg, Joseph, Friedland, Swire-Thompson, & Lazer, 2019;Hjorth & Adler-Nissen, 2019).…”
Section: Factors That Influence Disinformation Receptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, academics and the media have been paying attention to the phenomenon of disinformation McKay & Tenove, 2020). The fact that disinformation poses a threat to democratic institutions has contributed to mounting concern regarding this problem (Miller & Vaccari, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classroom discussions about the social aspects of the fact‐value distinction can contribute to a better understanding of its practical importance. In political philosophy, do we explain the importance for democracy of a common ground of facts, based on science, public statistics, freedom of information, and free speech? Currently, this common ground is threatened by systematic and deliberate disinformation, which is often disseminated with the purpose to destabilize democracy (McKay & Tenove, 2020). Do we invite students to reflect on the threats to this common ground, the difficulties involved in maintaining it, and what can be done to protect and strengthen it? Do we discuss the importance of impartiality, in particular in roles such as those of a judge, election official, or civil servant?…”
Section: A Checklistmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to 2017, disinformation rarely appears in academic literature, though now there is a marked increase in research across multiple disciplines (Freelon & Wells, 2020). Rather than necessarily drive a population toward a particular action, disinformation campaigns can create a confused, polarized, hostile information landscape (Pomerantsev & Weiss, 2014) that undermines deliberative democracy (McKay & Tenove, 2020). Linvill and Warren (2020), drawing from the partial IRA tweets dataset released by Twitter, identify five different account types being utilized by the agency between 2009 and 2018.…”
Section: Disinformation Campaignsmentioning
confidence: 99%