1996
DOI: 10.1007/bf01886371
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disinflation in the Italian economy in an optimal control setting

Abstract: In this article we use optimal control techniques and a nonlinear, small-size econometric model of the Italian economy, with the purpose of analyzing the disinflation process that has characterized the Italian economy during the period 1984–1987. Within the optimization framework, we question a wide range of issues of political economy, the role of incomes policy, and nominal anchors in promoting low-cost disinflation. Copyright Kluwer Academic Publishers 1996

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1997
1997
1997
1997

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
(12 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All of this has obvious implications for macro-policy. For instance, in 'fighting against inflation', different policy mixes between pegged exchange rate, fiscal austerity and monetary restriction have been endorsed as alternative strategies to eliminate inflation differential, but how long it will take for the economy to shrink the initial differential and how much it will cost in terms of unemployment and output depends very much on nominal rigidities (see, Blanchard and Muet, 1993;Chiarini, 1996;among others).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All of this has obvious implications for macro-policy. For instance, in 'fighting against inflation', different policy mixes between pegged exchange rate, fiscal austerity and monetary restriction have been endorsed as alternative strategies to eliminate inflation differential, but how long it will take for the economy to shrink the initial differential and how much it will cost in terms of unemployment and output depends very much on nominal rigidities (see, Blanchard and Muet, 1993;Chiarini, 1996;among others).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%