2015
DOI: 10.1177/0030222815612604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disgust Sensitivity Accounts for Some But Not All Gender Differences in Death Attitudes

Abstract: The present study investigated whether gender differences in death attitudes could be attributable to social desirability, locus of control, and disgust sensitivity. A total of 238 university students completed the Multidimensional Fear of Death Scale and the Revised Death Attitude Profile in addition to measures of social desirability, locus of control, and disgust sensitivity. Women scored higher than men on many of the fear dimensions and also on approach and escape acceptance. There were no gender differen… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation to these findings would be the difference in sensitivity related to gender and aging. Papers assessing sensitivity in other situations demonstrated effects of gender and age 28,29 , which were more intense in women and in the younger people. The clarification of this hypothesis regarding dysphagia requires more specific studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation to these findings would be the difference in sensitivity related to gender and aging. Papers assessing sensitivity in other situations demonstrated effects of gender and age 28,29 , which were more intense in women and in the younger people. The clarification of this hypothesis regarding dysphagia requires more specific studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This could be explained by the larger sample when these two groups of students were combined. Female preponderance in disgust sensitivity is a standard finding in previous reports [22,23]. As mentioned above, evolutionary, women use more energy and resources to birth and raise their children [22] and have to protect themselves and their children from illness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Medical students scored lower in all DS-R subscales compared to psychology students, with a median (25 th , 75 th ) total score of 49 (38, 61) and 62 (52, 75), respectively (p<0.001) ( Table 1), although score distribution of DS-R subscales did not differ between the two faculty students in relation to sex (Table 4). Medical students with Internal Medicine orientation scored higher in the Core Disgust subscale compared to Surgical and Laboratory Specialty (median (25 th , 75 th ): 32 (26.5, 34), 26 (22,28) and 27 (23,34), respectively, p=0.023) ( Table 2). Psychology students with Experimental postgraduate orientation scored lower in the Animal Reminder subscale (Tables 2, 3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While indicating that factors outside the model are also influencing attitudes towards organ donation, the percentage of explained variance is not without significance within social and psychological research where causal relations are more distally connected than normally seen in the biological sciences. Given the differences between male and female participants on several key variables, and in light of biological sex differences in general levels of disgust sensitivity reported in the literature 30 , 31 , we included the interaction term between biological sex and disgust sensitivity. The interaction term was also significant, which in this case means that the negative relationship between disgust sensitivity and support for organ donation was stronger for women than for men.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%