2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2010.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disgust and the development of posttraumatic stress among soldiers deployed to Afghanistan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
83
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(88 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
4
83
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, emotions and intuitions traditionally receive less attention. At the same time, we observe a welcome increase in attention for emotion in the broader military research literature (e.g., Andres & Rietveld, 2012;Engelhard, Olatunji & De Jong, 2011;Weibull, 2012). This is also important because of the high levels of stress as well as the intensity of the operational context in which servicemen operate during deployment, arguably evoking strong emotions (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Therefore, emotions and intuitions traditionally receive less attention. At the same time, we observe a welcome increase in attention for emotion in the broader military research literature (e.g., Andres & Rietveld, 2012;Engelhard, Olatunji & De Jong, 2011;Weibull, 2012). This is also important because of the high levels of stress as well as the intensity of the operational context in which servicemen operate during deployment, arguably evoking strong emotions (cf.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Boulos and Zamorski 54 Engelhard et al 60 Fear et al 10 (Afghanistan) Hoge et al 5 (Afghanistan) Hoge et al 22 (Afghanstan) Jones et al 64 Lapierre et al 67 (Afghanistan) Mulligan et al 72 Shen et al 79 have suggested this may be due to role distribution, but this finding is not universal. 13,[30][31][32][33][34] Recent research has also suggested that men and women can experience different stressors on deployment.…”
Section: Afghanistanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this only excluded a small number of papers (17 out of Note: Weights are from random effects analysis Male Cabrera et al 56 Engelhard et al 60 Maguen et al 30 Martin et al 70 Phillips et al 25 Polusny et al 75 Riviere et al 77 Woodhead et al 13 van Zuiden et al 81 Subtotal (I 2 = 99.2%, P < 0.001)…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations