The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 7:45 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 2 hours.
2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.06.042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the influences of multiple thalamic nuclei on prefrontal cortex and cognitive control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
43
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 327 publications
4
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…BOLD signal elevations in the thalamus and reticular formation are consistent with focused attention. Whereas the thalamus, and most especially the reticular thalamus supports selective attention, especially to sensory information (Guillery et al, 1998;Phillips et al, 2021), the reticular formation is critically involved in directing cortical arousal and attention to salient stimuli (Jones, 2003). The detection of the activation of these structures during melodic acoustic stimulation supports that our gradual habituation strategy to awake fMRI supports the discrimination of cognitive processes in the absence of stress confounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…BOLD signal elevations in the thalamus and reticular formation are consistent with focused attention. Whereas the thalamus, and most especially the reticular thalamus supports selective attention, especially to sensory information (Guillery et al, 1998;Phillips et al, 2021), the reticular formation is critically involved in directing cortical arousal and attention to salient stimuli (Jones, 2003). The detection of the activation of these structures during melodic acoustic stimulation supports that our gradual habituation strategy to awake fMRI supports the discrimination of cognitive processes in the absence of stress confounds.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…Notably, direct comparison using Bayesian contrast revealed a very strong evidence (posterior probability >99%) for increased modulatory connectivity from rIFG to rCau and rThal in the NoGo condition compared to the Go condition, suggesting the rIFG driven engagement of cortical-to-subcortical top-down control during response inhibition. Previous animal models and human neuroimaging meta-analyses have consistently identified the rIFG, as a key region implicated in dopaminergic and noradrenergic modulated inhibitory regulation (Bari et al, 2011; Hauber, 2010; Ott and Nieder, 2019; Pfeifer et al, 2022; Terra et al, 2020; Vijayraghavan et al, 2016; Zhukovsky et al, 2021) in particular during motor control and inhibition (Aron et al, 2003; Chamberlain and Sahakian, 2007; Puiu et al, 2020; Xu et al, 2016), while both, fronto-striatal and fronto-thalamic projections have been extensively involved in response inhibition (Ahissar and Oram, 2015; Bosch-Bouju et al, 2013; Marzinzik et al, 2008; Phillips et al, 2021; Schmitt et al, 2017; Sommer, 2003; Tanaka and Kunimatsu, 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Enhanced norepinephrine signaling facilitates response inhibition via modulation of the IFG and its connections with the striatum (Chamberlain et al, 2009; Rae et al, 2016), while the dorsal striatum represents an important locus of dopaminergic control of response inhibition (Ghahremani et al, 2012; Robertson et al, 2015) and the IFG plays an important role in top-down control of the basal ganglia regions (Buschman and Miller, 2014; Hampshire et al, 2010; Jahfari et al, 2012; Kim, 2014; Puiu et al, 2020; Renteria et al, 2018; Schaum et al, 2020; Tops and Boksem, 2011). In the basal ganglia-thalamocortical model of response inhibition (Alexander et al, 1986, 1991; Alexander and Crutcher, 1990) the thalamus relays information between the basal ganglia and cortex (Collins et al, 2018; Haber and Mcfarland, 2001; Haber and Calzavara, 2009; McFarland and Haber, 2002) - thus facilitating response inhibition and performance monitoring (Bosch-Bouju et al, 2013; Huang et al, 2018; Saalmann and Kastner, 2015; Tanaka and Kunimatsu, 2011) - via dense reciprocal connections with the basal ganglia and PFC (Guillery, 1995; Phillips et al, 2021; Xiao et al, 2009; Tanaka and Kunimatsu, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent studies have elucidated a role for MD regulating signal processing properties of mPFC neurons and stressed its importance for rapid trial-by-trial learning and complex decision making ( Mitchell and Chakraborty, 2013 ; Mitchell, 2015 ; Mukherjee et al, 2021 ; see above). The rostral intralaminar nuclei are organized to control cortico-cortical and corticostriatal interactions ( Groenewegen and Berendse, 1994 ; Saalmann, 2014 ; Phillips et al, 2021 ). Lesions of these nuclei have more widespread effects on behavior than MD lesions, more closely resembling effects of mPFC and striatal lesions ( Mair et al, 2021 ; Figures 4 – 6 ; see above).…”
Section: Multiple Neural Network Interact To Support Adaptive Goal-di...mentioning
confidence: 99%