2000
DOI: 10.1207/s15374424jccp2901_7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the Impact of Low Cognitive Ability and Inattention on Social Behavior and Peer Relationships

Abstract: Examined the shared and unique contributions of low cognitive ability and inattention to the development of social behavior problems and peer relationships of children at the time of school entry. Kindergarten and first-grade assessments of cognitive ability, inattention and prosocial and aggressive behavior were collected for a multisite, normative sample. Sociometric assessments of peer relationships were collected at the end of first grade. Cognitive ability and inattention both contributed to the predictio… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
73
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(76 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
2
73
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Low cognitive ability and inattention have been found to predict poor peer relations from kindergarten to first grade, whereas in the same study, behaviour problems partially mediated the relation between inattention and peer dislike (Bellanti & Bierman, 2000). However, investigators have not fully examined how prosocial behaviour (i.e., the child's ability to engage in positive social interactions; Rydell, Hagekull, & Bohlin, 1997) may be linked to the peer relations of children with ADHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Low cognitive ability and inattention have been found to predict poor peer relations from kindergarten to first grade, whereas in the same study, behaviour problems partially mediated the relation between inattention and peer dislike (Bellanti & Bierman, 2000). However, investigators have not fully examined how prosocial behaviour (i.e., the child's ability to engage in positive social interactions; Rydell, Hagekull, & Bohlin, 1997) may be linked to the peer relations of children with ADHD.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Interestingly, there is evidence to suggest that children with social PB experience greater neuropsychological deficits (e.g., planning, fluency, and working memory) than children with behavioral PB (McQuade et al 2011b). This may be because executive functioning relates to various social abilities, serving as prerequisites for skills such as detecting verbal cues, remembering conversations, and incorporating others' feedback (Bellanti and Bierman 2000;Clark et al 2002). Thus, the domain in which children with ADHD display PB may be an important predictor of the type of maladjustment that they may experience.…”
Section: Pb Domain Specificitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, variable-centered research often assumes that the association of one domain (e.g., reading skills) and later academic achievement is similar across the entire population of children, regardless of their level of competence in other domains (e.g., social skills). More recently, subgroup approaches that emphasize patterns among variables in the prediction of child development outcomes have become popular (e.g., Bellanti & Bierman, 2000;Farmer, Bierman, & The Conduct Problems Prevention Research Group, 2002;Lanza, Rhoades, Greenberg, Cox, & Family Life Project Key Investigators, 2011;Rhoades, Greenberg, Lanza, & Blair, 2011;Stormshak & Bierman, 1998). These approaches are aimed at identifying particular constellations of characteristics that describe subgroups of children (Bergman & Magnusson, 1997;Lewin, 1931) and thus account for the complex, interactional nature of the multiple factors that contribute to children's development (Laursen & Hoff, 2006).…”
Section: Subgroup Approaches To Understanding Child Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%