2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2022.108232
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the effect of nitrogen input and weed control on crop–weed competition suggests a potential agronomic trap in conventional farming

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A possible explanation for that in the competitiveness ranking between rotations could be partly due to differences in nitrogen (N) supply. Nitrogen is an important resource that strongly influences crop-weed competition [29][30][31] since high levels of N supply change both crop growth and weed biomass. That circumstance could have altered the competitive status of the species from one crop to another.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A possible explanation for that in the competitiveness ranking between rotations could be partly due to differences in nitrogen (N) supply. Nitrogen is an important resource that strongly influences crop-weed competition [29][30][31] since high levels of N supply change both crop growth and weed biomass. That circumstance could have altered the competitive status of the species from one crop to another.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No weeding compared to herbicides and manual hoeing resulted in lower values for all crop parameters except total weed dry weight ( Table 4 ). The increase of which would be largely related to the nitrogen applied which would have benefited nitrophilous weeds more than the crop [ 40 , 41 ]. Manual hoeing performed at 3–6 WAS did not reduce maize plant density.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%