2021
DOI: 10.2981/wlb.00886
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the direct and indirect effects of canopy and understory vegetation on the foraging habitat selection of the brown bear Ursus arctos

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the frequency of digging is the highest in larch plantations among other plantation forests (Tomita & Hiura, 2021a), we tested the effects of brown bear digging on the growth of canopy larch trees. The digging occurred more extensively in larch plantations not covered with understory dwarf bamboo ( Sasa kurilensis ) than in those covered with dwarf bamboo (Tomita & Hiura, 2021b). Thus, we set survey plots that were larch plantations dug and undug by brown bears; the dug plots were without understory cover and the undug plots had dwarf bamboo cover.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the frequency of digging is the highest in larch plantations among other plantation forests (Tomita & Hiura, 2021a), we tested the effects of brown bear digging on the growth of canopy larch trees. The digging occurred more extensively in larch plantations not covered with understory dwarf bamboo ( Sasa kurilensis ) than in those covered with dwarf bamboo (Tomita & Hiura, 2021b). Thus, we set survey plots that were larch plantations dug and undug by brown bears; the dug plots were without understory cover and the undug plots had dwarf bamboo cover.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, closed forests and the structure of the lower vegetation directly or indirectly affect the habitat selection of a species due to changes in its habitat and prey-food preference. This is particularly more effective in the food habitat selection of predatory species (Tomita and Hiura 2021). In general, closed forest stands are preferred more by a lot of wild mammals, while open stands are less preferred (Hodorff et.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The changes that will occur in the habitats of the species may cause their spread to regions with better ecological conditions (forced migration) or extinction in that region, rather than adapting to new conditions (Raia et al 2011). For example, in a study that stated that the forest cover and the density of the lower vegetation, directly and indirectly, affect the feeding habitat selection of grizzly bears it was determined that the removal of dwarf bamboo which is an important sub-vegetation cover of the region expands the feeding areas of this species (Tomita and Hiura 2021). Again, in a different study, it was determined that wolves mostly prefer high-quality habitats away from humans with high hunting success (Lesmerises et.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%