2012
DOI: 10.5539/res.v4n5p1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the Climate-conflict Nexus: Empirical and Theoretical Assessment of Vulnerabilities and Pathways

Abstract:

Recent research has provided new insights into the relationship between climate change and violent conflict. In this review we compare the results, methodologies, and data applied in the peer-reviewed literature to recap the current state of the debate. While long-term historical studies suggest a coincidence between climate variability and armed conflict, empirical findings are less conclusive for recent periods. Disentangling the climate-conflict nexus, we discuss causal pathways such as precipitation cha… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
47
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
1
47
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the arrival of water conflict is often signalled years in advance by deteriorating climatic, socio-demographic, economics and governance conditions, the CWCVI variables provide a basis for a fine-grained causality analysis that can lead to socially focused solutions-such as group agricultural cooperatives, conservation of common property resources and conflict resolution, and strengthening of collective adaptation actions. These solutions are consistent with what many consider as suitable vulnerability interventions in a climate-conflict context where vulnerability is experienced (Scheffran et al 2012;Sterzel et al 2014).…”
Section: Prioritising Vulnerability Assessment In Climate and Water Csupporting
confidence: 62%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Although the arrival of water conflict is often signalled years in advance by deteriorating climatic, socio-demographic, economics and governance conditions, the CWCVI variables provide a basis for a fine-grained causality analysis that can lead to socially focused solutions-such as group agricultural cooperatives, conservation of common property resources and conflict resolution, and strengthening of collective adaptation actions. These solutions are consistent with what many consider as suitable vulnerability interventions in a climate-conflict context where vulnerability is experienced (Scheffran et al 2012;Sterzel et al 2014).…”
Section: Prioritising Vulnerability Assessment In Climate and Water Csupporting
confidence: 62%
“…It points to a repertoire of potential explanatory factors (e.g. feelings of insecurity, dependency on Lake water and agriculture, climate-related losses and livelihood diversity) linking climate and (water) conflict (Scheffran et al 2012).…”
Section: Prioritising Vulnerability Assessment In Climate and Water Cmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This might be one reason for the substantial disagreement on the matter in the literature. Moving beyond purely meteorological indices toward the development of composite indices accounting for vulnerability and exposure to climate change, as well as conflict risk provides a promising way forward to reconcile this debate (48,49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, in recent years, the argument that climate change increases the risk of Ôclimate warsÕ and conflict has lost much appeal due to the lack of empirical evidence (see Scheffran et al 2012). …”
Section: Energy Climate and Securitymentioning
confidence: 99%