2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevaccelbeams.22.034501
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling the bulk and exit surface contribution on projectile-charge-state evolution

Abstract: Charge state evolution of the projectile ions while traversing through the solid target medium has been explored using the radiative electron capture process. The measured centroid energies of the convoluted radiative electron capture peak structures have been used to determine the mean K-shell binding energies and mean charge state of the projectile ions. It has been observed that the mean charge states of present measurements are lower than the earlier measurements done using the characteristic K α x-ray tra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(61 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The contrasting picture between incident charge state and q m inside the target is governed by the ion-solid interaction at the bulk of the target. While the q m for the outside the target is guided by the ion interaction with the solid surface [36][37][38]. In second step, the q m -values inside the target are substituted in the Lorentzian charge state distribution [38] to obtain the F(q) as follows…”
Section: Fig 3: Comparison Of Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The contrasting picture between incident charge state and q m inside the target is governed by the ion-solid interaction at the bulk of the target. While the q m for the outside the target is guided by the ion interaction with the solid surface [36][37][38]. In second step, the q m -values inside the target are substituted in the Lorentzian charge state distribution [38] to obtain the F(q) as follows…”
Section: Fig 3: Comparison Of Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the q m for the outside the target is guided by the ion interaction with the solid surface [36][37][38]. In second step, the q m -values inside the target are substituted in the Lorentzian charge state distribution [38] to obtain the F(q) as follows…”
Section: Fig 3: Comparison Of Experimentalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This feature has been described in detail by Chatterjee et al [20]. In the second part of the procedure, the q m values inside the target are substituted by a Lorentzian charge state distribution [49] to obtain the F (q) as follows…”
Section: Effect Of the L-k Electron Capture On The L-shell Ionization...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2(I). This contrasting picture is governed by the solid surface [2,9]. In second step, the q m -values inside the target are substituted in the Lorentzian charge state distribution [4] to obtain the F(q) as follows…”
Section: Theory Of Electron Capture Phenomenonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, any direct measurement of the ionization phenomena inside the target was not possible until a couple of years ago [7] using the x-ray spectroscopy technique [8]. The charge state of the projectile ion (q) in the beam-foil plasma created due to ion-solid interactions [4] is considerably higher than the measured ionic state outside the target [9] because of electron capture phenomena from the exit surface [2]. Such an interesting feature has not yet been exploited in the foil stripper technology till date.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%