2015
DOI: 10.5849/jof.14-088
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling Forest Change from Forest Inventory Change: A Case Study from the US Interior West

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
35
2

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
35
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Past and current FIA data include two general sets of sampling protocols termed periodic and annual, respectively. These two sampling protocols differ by subplot number and configuration (Figure 1), sampling design, and types of measurement (Goeking 2015;McRoberts et al 2005). Former FIA surveys (before 1998) were termed periodic as return times to a particular state for re-measurement ranged from 6 to 18 years (McRoberts et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Past and current FIA data include two general sets of sampling protocols termed periodic and annual, respectively. These two sampling protocols differ by subplot number and configuration (Figure 1), sampling design, and types of measurement (Goeking 2015;McRoberts et al 2005). Former FIA surveys (before 1998) were termed periodic as return times to a particular state for re-measurement ranged from 6 to 18 years (McRoberts et al 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Former FIA surveys (before 1998) were termed periodic as return times to a particular state for re-measurement ranged from 6 to 18 years (McRoberts et al 2005). The USDA Forest Service recognized issues with the periodic sampling protocol, including bias and uncertainty due to regionally variable sampling protocols and definitions (Goeking 2015), which, when compounded by land-use change over long sample periods, made area and volume estimation increasingly difficult over large regions (McRoberts et al 2005). To alleviate such problems, the 1998 Farm Bill laid out a plan to initiate an annual protocol of FIA sampling (after 1998) that would standardize a national set of core variables.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nationally, the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Forest Service inventories permanent plots across each state annually, visiting 20% of all plots per state per year [16]. Prior to 1998, data collection protocols for the Forest Service's Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program were not nationally consistent, resulting in variable trends by state across several forest measures [17]. Many studies have shown that inconsistent data collection, observer bias, and varying sampling methods have an effect on data analysis and interpretation [3,10,17,18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior to 1998, data collection protocols for the Forest Service's Forest Inventory and Analysis (FIA) program were not nationally consistent, resulting in variable trends by state across several forest measures [17]. Many studies have shown that inconsistent data collection, observer bias, and varying sampling methods have an effect on data analysis and interpretation [3,10,17,18]. To combat these issues and improve statistical power, researchers recommend extensive training on data collection protocols, specific objectives, consistent observers, and/or quality control data assessments [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beginning in 2000, all states began implementing a nationally consistent, statistically robust sample and plot design [20]. To mitigate for known confounding effects of inventory methods, sample designs, and definitions between the two periods [24], we compared proportions of live and dead trees relative to the total number of whitebark pine trees during the historical period, rather than actual numbers of trees.…”
Section: Number Of Trees By Size Class and Forest Typementioning
confidence: 99%