2008
DOI: 10.1080/09644000802490527
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentangling DoublePolitikverflechtung? The Implications of the Federal Reforms for Bund–Länder Relations on Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Héritier indeed indicates that ‘given a choice between different levels/arenas of decision-making, an actor, by opting out of one arena and shifting the decision to another, may improve his prospects of obtaining an institutional change according to his preferences’ (2007: 30). While institutional change was hoped for directly at the EU level, it was better accomplished by a number of regional governments at the national level (Jeffery, 2007a; Moore and Eppler, 2008; Tatham, 2011). 16…”
Section: Sources Of Endogenous Pressure For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Héritier indeed indicates that ‘given a choice between different levels/arenas of decision-making, an actor, by opting out of one arena and shifting the decision to another, may improve his prospects of obtaining an institutional change according to his preferences’ (2007: 30). While institutional change was hoped for directly at the EU level, it was better accomplished by a number of regional governments at the national level (Jeffery, 2007a; Moore and Eppler, 2008; Tatham, 2011). 16…”
Section: Sources Of Endogenous Pressure For Changementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strictly speaking, regions can be conceived as domestic non-state actors that have some leverage in the national institutional and political set-up through a battery of formal and informal means. These range from the more institutionalized and constraining, such as in the case of the German Länder and the so-called Politikverflechtung (Scharpf, 1988, 2006; Moore and Eppler, 2008), to the more diffuse and informal, such as in unitary and centralized states (Le Galès and Lequesne, 1998; Négrier and Jouve, 1998). In twenty-first century Europe, most regions generally ‘stand to gain and lose a great deal per capita ’ (Moravcsik, 1993: 483) as the functions and competences devolved to them increasingly overlap with those delegated to the EU (Jeffery, 1997a; Bourne, 2003, 2004; Fleurke and Willemse, 2006; Tatham, 2007b).…”
Section: Overlooked and Misunderstood: The Impact Of Devolution On Rementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This paper draws upon the policy networks model to interrogate the role of communities in the governance network in relation to autonomy, funding and other actors, and asks the question, what role do community actors play in regeneration? In so doing, this paper contributes to the policy networks and governance literature, particularly the tradition of politikverflechtung in German politics (Katzenstein, 1987;Scharpf, 1988Scharpf, , 2006Moore and Eppler, 2008;Van Waarden, 1992) as well as to the regeneration policy literature (Schridde, 2001) and more broadly to the institutional literature on federalism (Jeffery, 1994;Schmidt, 2003) and to German environmental politics (Bluhdorn et al, 1995;Lees, 2000;Weale, 1992;Wimmer and Wahl, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 88%