Disentangling between stellar activity and planetary signals

Abstract

Photospheric stellar activity (i.e. dark spots or bright plages) might be an important source of noise and confusion in stellar radialvelocity (RV) measurements. Radial-velocimetry planet search surveys as well as follow-up of photometric transit surveys require a deeper understanding and characterization of the effects of stellar activities to differentiate them from planetary signals. We simulate dark spots on a rotating stellar photosphere. The variations in the photometry, RV, and spectral line shapes are characterized and analyzed according to the stellar inclination, the latitude, and the number of spots. We show that the anti-correlation between RV and bisector span, known to be a signature of activity, requires a good sampling to be resolved when there are several spots on the photosphere. The Lomb-Scargle periodograms of the RV variations induced by activity present power at the rotational period P rot of the star and its two first harmonics P rot /2 and P rot /3. Three adjusted sinusoids fixed at the fundamental period and its two-first harmonics allow us to remove about 90% of the RV jitter amplitude. We apply and validate our approach on four known active planethost stars: HD 189733, GJ 674, CoRoT-7, and ι Hor. We succeed in fitting simultaneously activity and planetary signals on GJ674 and CoRoT-7. This simultaneous modeling of the activity and planetary parameters leads to slightly higher masses of CoRoT-7b and c of respectively, 5.7 ± 2.5 M Earth and 13.2 ± 4.1 M Earth . The larger uncertainties properly take into account the stellar active jitter. We exclude short-period low-mass exoplanets around ι Hor. For data with realistic time-sampling and white Gaussian noise, we use simulations to show that our approach is effective in distinguishing reflex-motion due to a planetary companion and stellar-activityinduced RV variations provided that 1) the planetary orbital period is not close to that of the stellar rotation or one of its two first harmonics; 2) the semi-amplitude of the planet exceeds ∼30% of the semi-amplitude of the active signal; 3) the rotational period of the star is accurately known, and 4) the data cover more than one stellar rotational period.

Modelling the RV jitter of early-M dwarfs using tomographic imaging

“…This index is defined as the ratio between the flux in the Hα absorption line and that in the surrounding continuum, as described in Boisse et al (2011). We use a 0.16 nm window centered at 656.2808 nm for the central line, and two windows of 1.075 and 0.875 nm around 655.087 and 658.031 nm respectively for the continuum as presented in Gomes Da Silva et al (2011).…”

Evidence of a substellar companion around a very young T Tauri star

“…Harmonics are expected to affect RVs when rotational modulation of light by stellar spots occurs (see, e.g., Boisse et al 2011). We made a preliminary test of the presence of such rotational harmonics in our data (using the rotational period calculated in Sect.…”

The SOPHIE search for northern extrasolar planets

“…Seeing change at the fiber input introduced radial velocity changes. This so-called seeing effect on SOPHIE has been described by Boisse et al (2010Boisse et al ( , 2011, Díaz et al (2012), and Bouchy et al (2013). Considering that variations in the pupil illumination produce a differential RV effect along spectral orders, the difference between RVs measured in each half of the spectral orders can be used to partially correct the main RV.…”