2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.121.190503
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disentanglement Cost of Quantum States

Abstract: We show that the minimal rate of noise needed to catalytically erase the entanglement in a bipartite quantum state is given by the regularized relative entropy of entanglement. This offers a solution to the central open question raised in [Groisman et al., PRA 72, 032317 (2005)] and complements their main result that the minimal rate of noise needed to erase all correlations is given by the quantum mutual information. We extend our discussion to the tripartite setting where we show that an asymptotic rate of n… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We saw earlier that the set of free operations induces Majorization theory is a topic in matrix analysis with several textbooks written on the subject; see e.g. (Marshall et al, 2011) and(Bhatia, 1996). It has many applications in different areas of science, from mathematics to economy and statistics, and more recently quantum physics.…”
Section: A Majorization Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We saw earlier that the set of free operations induces Majorization theory is a topic in matrix analysis with several textbooks written on the subject; see e.g. (Marshall et al, 2011) and(Bhatia, 1996). It has many applications in different areas of science, from mathematics to economy and statistics, and more recently quantum physics.…”
Section: A Majorization Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A natural question which arises in this context is whether the given measure can be understood in an operational sense, assessing exactly the usefulness of a given object in some physical task; however, establishing such an interpretation for a given quantifier is often highly nontrivial. The family of so-called robustness measures [34,84] stands out in this context, as two prominent members of the family have found several applications in operational settings: these are the generalized robustness [33,36,[79][80][81][82][85][86][87][88][89][90][91] and the standard robustness [18,89,92]. They are not only fundamental resource quantifiers faithfully capturing the resourcefulness of given objects with clear geometric interpretations, but also significantly relevant to experiments -they are directly observable, that is, can be obtained in an experiment by measuring a single, suitably chosen observable, rather than requiring complicated and expensive methods such as state tomography, allowing for the experimental quantification of resources [93,94].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Similarly, the generalized robustness of entanglement corresponds to the largest fidelity achievable with a maximally entangled state under free transformations [58]. The logarithmic version of this measure, known as the max-relative entropy [59], plays an essential role in the characterization of one-shot entanglement dilution [60,61] and one-shot coherence dilution [62], and quantifies the minimal rate of noise needed to catalytically erase the resource contained in a given state for a wider class of resource theories [28,63]. However, a general operational meaning of the generalized robustness in all convex resource theories was not known.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%