2020
DOI: 10.17227/ted.num48-12383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diseño y validación de instrumentos de evaluación de pensamiento crítico en educación primaria

Abstract: El objetivo principal de este artículo de investigación es analizar la elaboración y validación de instrumentos de evaluación de habilidades de Pensamiento Crítico (PC) aplicables en el alumnado de entre 11 y 14 años, así como analizar una implementación de estos en un contexto educativo. En primer lugar, se realiza el diseño de una modificación del Halpern Critical Thinking Assessment (HCTA, por sus siglas en inglés). Seguidamente, se analizan las propiedades psicométricas con los resultados obtenidos de la a… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
(7 reference statements)
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The instrument was developed and validated according to the standards in use (Cubillos-Veja and Ferrán-Aranaz 2018;García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso et al 2020;López-de-Arana Prado et al, 2019;Ortega-Quevedo et al 2020;Tejada-Fernández et al 2015;Usart Rodríguez et al 2020). Both the form and the subject matter of the object to be evaluated were considered, a set of dimensions and criteria were established halfway between generalization and detail, and measurement scales were created according to each case, duly provided with semantic content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The instrument was developed and validated according to the standards in use (Cubillos-Veja and Ferrán-Aranaz 2018;García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso et al 2020;López-de-Arana Prado et al, 2019;Ortega-Quevedo et al 2020;Tejada-Fernández et al 2015;Usart Rodríguez et al 2020). Both the form and the subject matter of the object to be evaluated were considered, a set of dimensions and criteria were established halfway between generalization and detail, and measurement scales were created according to each case, duly provided with semantic content.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%