2017
DOI: 10.14201/et20173521736
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diseño y confiabilidad de una rúbrica para evaluar infografías didácticas

Abstract: RESUMEN: El objetivo de esta investigación es describir el diseño, validación y medición de la confiabilidad de una rúbrica para evaluar la calidad de infografías didácticas. Los participantes fueron quince jueces relacionados con la elaboración de infografías didácticas. El diseño de la rúbrica se llevó a cabo en tres etapas: diseño, ajustes y determinación de la confiabilidad. La validez de contenido fue medida a través del porcentaje de acuerdo entre tres jueces por cada rubro. Así mismo se obtuvo un alpha … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These coincide with the competencies which are most highly demanded by employers, as stated by Navia-Osorio (2017), Fernández (2018), Canossa (2019) and Zarta and Trujillo (2020) and the Manpower Group report (Przytuła, 2018). Throughout design, the inclusion of indicators for each competency, as well as various levels of development in each indicator were guaranteed in order to speed up the assessment process for teachers, in line with Guzmán-Cedillo et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…These coincide with the competencies which are most highly demanded by employers, as stated by Navia-Osorio (2017), Fernández (2018), Canossa (2019) and Zarta and Trujillo (2020) and the Manpower Group report (Przytuła, 2018). Throughout design, the inclusion of indicators for each competency, as well as various levels of development in each indicator were guaranteed in order to speed up the assessment process for teachers, in line with Guzmán-Cedillo et al (2017).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…has compared the retention of information that the student has for days, in contrast to oral presentations or the use of other visual resources such as slides (Bernal-Gamboa & Guzmán-Cedillo, 2021). However, there are still not many studies that allow us to share the minimum requirements to assess infographics as a learning product, as has been done by Guzmán-Cedillo et al (2017). This orientation would greatly help teachers in their day to day.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although, special care must be taken in the evaluation instruments used to assess a didactic infographic. Guzmán-Cedillo et al (2017) validated a rubric through expert judgment; It shows three levels of performance -from novice to expert-and nine dimensions to be evaluated. The delimitation of instruments helps to carry out an adequate evaluation and for the students to clearly identify the criteria they must follow for constructing their evaluative products.…”
Section: Infographics In the Teaching-learning Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Debido a sus bondades, las infografías han surgido como una herramienta clave para transmitir información sobre un tema (Yılıdrım et al, 2014;Yıldırım, 2016;Yılıdrım, 2017). Algunos investigadores (Çifçi, 2016;Guzmán-Cedillo et al, 2015;Guzmán-Cedillo et al, 2017) las mencionan como recursos educativos que sintetizan y visualizan información fomentando su utilización multidimensional y analítico.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified