1999
DOI: 10.1080/02682629908657467
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disenfranchised grief

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
164
0
19

Year Published

2002
2002
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 210 publications
(192 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
4
164
0
19
Order By: Relevance
“…The novel insights this review identifies, with regards to the experiences of bereaved parents, include the importance of being with others who have experienced the death of a child, the importance of others respecting and supporting continued bonds with the deceased child, and the potential of having other children to be a protective factor. Furthermore, the findings are consistent with literature which describes the potential for social networks to be either facilitative or disenfranchising (Doka, 1999) and a barrier to growth. A notion described by the Social Constructionist Model of Grief which posits that an individual’s experiences of grief are nested within a social context and that depending on the concordance with the individuals grief, social support can become either helpful or a hindrance (Neimeyer, Klass, & Dennis, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…The novel insights this review identifies, with regards to the experiences of bereaved parents, include the importance of being with others who have experienced the death of a child, the importance of others respecting and supporting continued bonds with the deceased child, and the potential of having other children to be a protective factor. Furthermore, the findings are consistent with literature which describes the potential for social networks to be either facilitative or disenfranchising (Doka, 1999) and a barrier to growth. A notion described by the Social Constructionist Model of Grief which posits that an individual’s experiences of grief are nested within a social context and that depending on the concordance with the individuals grief, social support can become either helpful or a hindrance (Neimeyer, Klass, & Dennis, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…the ‘perfect’ birth). The importance of person-centred care and the acknowledgement of the baby are consistent with previous literature (Doka, 1999). There has been debate around the guidance in relation to parents being offered to see their baby after death.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This increased communication may have had a ''normalizing'' effect on the subject and thereby contributed to a gradual reduction of the shame, taboo, and stigma that historically, culturally, and religiously have surrounded the subject, at least for the Swedish bereaved in the present study, the majority of whom are users of digital resources and living in a highly secular culture and society (World Values Survey, 2015). This reduction of shame may in turn have an impact on disenfranchised grief (Doka, 1989), in so far as grief after suicide may be more easily accepted and socially sanctioned.…”
Section: Do Digital Resources Have Any Impact On Suicide Bereaved Peomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The stigma may lead to the grief not being accepted and socially sanctioned, and this can result in the bereaved individuals' withdrawal from their sociocultural context (Bell et al, 2012). Doka (1989) has termed this social reaction to the suicide stigma a disenfranchised grief. However, a systematic review of the literature on suicide bereavement among adolescents showed that grief and mourning after a suicide does not always have to be a more problematic issue than other forms of bereavement, at least not among younger people (Andriessen, Dudley, Draper, & Mitchell, 2017).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%