1942
DOI: 10.1097/00007611-194204000-00023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Diseases of the Blood and Atlas of Hematology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1944
1944
1944
1944

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The question arose whether the brother had died not of monocytic leukaemia but of a myelogenous leu.kaemia, which had been in the monocytic phase at the time of his arrival in hos-p4jal (Kracke and Garver, 1937). The absence of a marked myeloid reaction was regarded as a strong point in the support of the former diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question arose whether the brother had died not of monocytic leukaemia but of a myelogenous leu.kaemia, which had been in the monocytic phase at the time of his arrival in hos-p4jal (Kracke and Garver, 1937). The absence of a marked myeloid reaction was regarded as a strong point in the support of the former diagnosis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question arose whether the brother had died not of monocytic leukaemia but of a myelogenous leu.kaemia, which had been in the monocytic phase at the time of his arrival in hos-p4jal (Kracke and Garver, 1937). The absence of a marked myeloid reaction was regarded as a strong point in the support of the former diagnosis.…”
Section: Journalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Haematologically, therefore, the signs were those of monocytic leukaemia. Reference to the literature, however, indicated that these facts alone were not conclusive' evidence in favour of such a diagnosis.The question arose whether the brother had died not of monocytic leukaemia but of a myelogenous leu.kaemia, which had been in the monocytic phase at the time of his arrival in hos-p4jal (Kracke and Garver, 1937). The absence of a marked myeloid reaction was regarded as a strong point in the support of the former diagnosis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%