2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.12.07.471296
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

DISEASES 2.0: a weekly updated database of disease–gene associations from text mining and data integration

Abstract: The scientific knowledge about which genes are involved in which diseases grows rapidly, which makes it difficult to keep up with new publications and genetics datasets. The DISEASES database aims to provide a comprehensive overview by systematically integrating and assigning confidence scores to evidence for disease–gene associations from curated databases, genome-wide association studies (GWAS), and automatic text mining of the biomedical literature. Here, we present a major update to this resource, which gr… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
(45 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…By this method, there were 60 up‐regulated and 73 down‐regulated proteins (Figure 4A). Using the latter set of differentially expressed proteins, we performed downstream analysis by KEGG pathways, Gene Ontology keywords, WikiPathways, UniProt keywords, and Diseases pathways 39–43 . We also used the STRING database to create an interactome (Figure S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…By this method, there were 60 up‐regulated and 73 down‐regulated proteins (Figure 4A). Using the latter set of differentially expressed proteins, we performed downstream analysis by KEGG pathways, Gene Ontology keywords, WikiPathways, UniProt keywords, and Diseases pathways 39–43 . We also used the STRING database to create an interactome (Figure S3).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Up‐regulated and down‐regulated proteins in response to MOR were assessed by Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins (STRING) ifor significant interactions (String Consortium, Switzerland). Using these outputs, we identified cellular and disease related processes enriched with MOR, as determined by Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG pathway, Kyoto, Japan), Gene Ontology, WikiPathway, Diseases database (Novo Nordisk Foundation Center for Protein Research, Denmark), and UniProt keyword 38–43 …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Next, using the taxonomy ID of MPXV, we collected reviewed protein entries (Swiss-Prot) from UniProt (Apweiler et al, 2004). For human proteins, we queried DISEASES, a human disease database, with DOID:3292 (Grissa et al, 2022). Lastly, Open Targets Platform was used to fetch information about “druggability” of proteins reported from studies (Ochoa et al, 2021).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the curated phenotype lists described above, human phenotype-gene associations were retrieved from multiple sources, including Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man (OMIM) [26], Orphanet [27], ClinVar [28], DISEASES [29], DatabasE of genomiC varIation and Phenotype in Humans using Ensembl Resources (DECIPHER) [30], the American Heart Association (AHA) [31], and Geneshot [32]. From OMIM and Orphanet human phenotype-gene associations were obtained from the Jackson Laboratory HPO database (hpo.jax.org, October 2021 release), providing curated links between HPO terms and human genes.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ClinVar-based HPO-gene associations were compiled for the human abnormal morphology of the great vessels, heart, and CNS phenotypes. Literature-based human disease-gene associations were obtained from the DISEASES portal [29]. This dataset contains disease-gene associations text-mined from literature and genome-wide association studies.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%