2020
DOI: 10.1111/evo.14023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease swamps molecular signatures of genetic‐environmental associations to abiotic factors in Tasmanian devil ( Sarcophilus harrisii ) populations

Abstract: Landscape genomics studies focus on identifying candidate genes under selection via spatial variation in abiotic environmental variables, but rarely by biotic factors (i.e., disease). The Tasmanian devil (Sarcophilus harrisii) is found only on the environmentally heterogeneous island of Tasmania and is threatened with extinction by a transmissible cancer, devil facial tumor disease (DFTD). Devils persist in regions of long‐term infection despite epidemiological model predictions of species’ extinction, suggest… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
41
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
10
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Across six study sites that span the geographic range of Tasmanian devils, and genomic samples of over 2500 devils collected over 15 years, we found widespread signatures of rapid evolution in populations impacted by DFTD. Despite concerns that devils may not harbour sufficient genetic diversity to sufficiently respond to DFTD, we identified 186 candidate genes (Supplemental Table S4) with robust signatures of positive selection, reaffirming the adaptive potential of wild devils described in a growing body of work (2,47,48,70). Our targeted RADcapture sampling approach allowed us to sequence many more individual devils than previous studies and examine specific loci and regions of interest.…”
Section: Contemporary Responses To Dftdsupporting
confidence: 61%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Across six study sites that span the geographic range of Tasmanian devils, and genomic samples of over 2500 devils collected over 15 years, we found widespread signatures of rapid evolution in populations impacted by DFTD. Despite concerns that devils may not harbour sufficient genetic diversity to sufficiently respond to DFTD, we identified 186 candidate genes (Supplemental Table S4) with robust signatures of positive selection, reaffirming the adaptive potential of wild devils described in a growing body of work (2,47,48,70). Our targeted RADcapture sampling approach allowed us to sequence many more individual devils than previous studies and examine specific loci and regions of interest.…”
Section: Contemporary Responses To Dftdsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…In the top 1% of DCMS scores, we identified 144 candidate SNPs for contemporary selection by DFTD; of these, 79 had annotated genes (186 total) within 100 kb (Figure 2; Supplemental Table S4). In our comparison of previously identified candidate genes in devils (47,48,50,63), we found many overlapping candidates (See Discussion), but only significant enrichment among our contemporary candidates for those associated with disease-related phenotypes (50), with the largest odds ratio for genes associated with phenotypes in females (14 genes, p-value=5.1e-08, Odds ratio=7.1). Gene ontology enrichment analysis found middle ear morphogenesis (GO:0042474) significantly enriched among contemporary candidate SNPs (FDR < 0.05).…”
Section: Evidence For Contemporary Selectionmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Previous work indicates up to six genetic populations island-wide, including a clear distinction between individuals sampled from northwestern Tasmania and those from elsewhere on the island (Brüniche-Olsen, Jones, Austin, Burridge, & Holland, 2014;Fraik et al, 2020;Hendricks et al, 2017;Miller et al, 2011;Storfer et al, 2017). The cause of this east-to-west spatial genetic heterogeneity remains unclear, with previous landscape genetics work implementing least-cost path modelling and microsatellite loci unable to identify any landscape factors driving this variation (Storfer et al, 2017).…”
Section: Study Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%