2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cgh.2021.10.040
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease Progression Modeling for Economic Evaluation in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease—A Systematic Review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between NAFLD and extrahepatic disease outcomes in patients with NAFLD. 15,[27][28][29] However, no study has analysed the costeffectiveness of each extrahepatic disease outcome in patients with NAFLD. Remarkably, the estimated total medical cost for liver and CVD combined model was approximately 2.35 times higher than that for liver; CVD and extrahepatic malignancy combined model was approximately 6.7 times higher than that for liver-related outcomes in the no screening setting (Table 1 and Figure S3a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between NAFLD and extrahepatic disease outcomes in patients with NAFLD. 15,[27][28][29] However, no study has analysed the costeffectiveness of each extrahepatic disease outcome in patients with NAFLD. Remarkably, the estimated total medical cost for liver and CVD combined model was approximately 2.35 times higher than that for liver; CVD and extrahepatic malignancy combined model was approximately 6.7 times higher than that for liver-related outcomes in the no screening setting (Table 1 and Figure S3a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our study aimed to estimate the socio‐economic burden and benefits of ILI in the at‐risk population, with regards to hepatic disease, CVD and extrahepatic malignancies. Numerous studies have investigated the relationship between NAFLD and extrahepatic disease outcomes in patients with NAFLD 15,27–29 . However, no study has analysed the cost‐effectiveness of each extrahepatic disease outcome in patients with NAFLD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Quantitative models serve the purpose of informing such prospective investigations based on scenario testing that evaluates and designs sampling times and frequency and sample size considerations ( Mould, 2007 ; Cook and Bies, 2016 ). A disease progression model can also describe patient phenotypes and inform enrollment criteria as well as the timing of proposed interventions and treatments relative to the current standard of care ( Cook and Bies, 2016 ; Gruneau et al, 2021 ). Hence, they have tremendous value for both the sponsors of such proposed interventions and regulators who must evaluate their safety and efficacy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors conducted a systematic review of published NAFLD disease progression models, including 28 articles; 13 projected NAFLD disease and economic burden without investigating a particular intervention, 8 studies evaluated NAFLD treatment interventions, and 7 studies evaluated the cost-effectiveness of NAFLD screening or diagnosis. Gruneau et al 8 find substantial heterogeneity in the simulated natural history of NAFLD across the included studies. Although all models defined natural history using NAFLD fibrosis stages, annual rate of progression from F0 to F1 varied between studies by 2-fold (0.059-0.095), from F1 to F2 varied 6-fold (0.023-0.140), from F2 to F3 varied 4-fold (0.018-0.070), and F3 to F4 (0.040-0.118) varied 3-fold.…”
Section: Heterogeneity In Simulating Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease...mentioning
confidence: 99%