2009
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01589.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease, predation and demography: assessing the impacts of bovine tuberculosis on African buffalo by monitoring at individual and population levels

Abstract: Summary 1.Understanding the effects of disease is critical to determining appropriate management responses, but estimating those effects in wildlife species is challenging. We used bovine tuberculosis (BTB) in the African buffalo Syncerus caffer population of Kruger National Park, South Africa, as a case study to highlight the issues associated with estimating chronic disease effects in a long-lived host. 2. We used known and radiocollared buffalo, aerial census data, and a natural gradient in pathogen prevale… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

2
90
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(50 reference statements)
2
90
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although analysis of crude mortality suggested that RVFV-seropositive animals were less likely to survive than seronegative animals, seropositive animals were also more likely to be older and female, and these characteristics were associated with differences in mortality risk. 17 After multivariable adjustment of mortality hazard for age, sex, and age-sex interaction with the use of Cox proportional hazards technique, mortality rates were not significantly different between RVFV-seronegative and RVFV-seropositive buffalo ( Figure 6 ). The multiply-adjusted hazard ratio for RVFV seropositivity was 1.09 (95% confidence interval = 0.57-2.08) for seronegative versus seropositive animals (χ 2 = 0.074, degrees of freedom = 1, P = 0.78, not significant).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Although analysis of crude mortality suggested that RVFV-seropositive animals were less likely to survive than seronegative animals, seropositive animals were also more likely to be older and female, and these characteristics were associated with differences in mortality risk. 17 After multivariable adjustment of mortality hazard for age, sex, and age-sex interaction with the use of Cox proportional hazards technique, mortality rates were not significantly different between RVFV-seronegative and RVFV-seropositive buffalo ( Figure 6 ). The multiply-adjusted hazard ratio for RVFV seropositivity was 1.09 (95% confidence interval = 0.57-2.08) for seronegative versus seropositive animals (χ 2 = 0.074, degrees of freedom = 1, P = 0.78, not significant).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Description of area habitat and the details of animal capture, clinical assessment, specimen sampling, and tracking have been presented in detail elsewhere. [16][17][18] ( Figure 1 ). Briefly, from a defined sub-region of Kruger National Park having a buffalo population of approximately 3,000, 593 buffalo were captured at 302 georeferenced locations by using aerial or ground darting techniques, working in close collaboration with veterinarians in Kruger National Park.…”
Section: Study Populationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Rinderpest virus originally caused major declines in buffalo numbers after 1890 but the virus has not caused declines since the 1960s (Dobson 1995;Dublin et al 1990a;Rossiter et al 1983;Sinclair et al 2008), and indeed it is now globally extinct (Normille 2008). Bovine tuberculosis (Myobacterium bovis), although prevalent in South Africa (Cross et al 2009), has not been found in Serengeti buffalo (Cleaveland et al 2008;Sinclair 1977). Drought can be a major controlling factor and drought induced mortality occurred in 1993 causing approximately 40% mortality in the buffalo population.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%