2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-021-10932-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease-modifying treatments for multiple sclerosis have not affected the incidence of neoplasms in clinical trials over 3 decades: a meta-analysis with meta-regression

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 35 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although Grytten et al reported an increased incidence of cancer among MS patients compared to controls for the time period from 1996 to 2017, corresponding in time to the introduction of DMT for MS, this effect has been observed predominantly among MS patients older than 60 years of age [ 12 ] and other studies analyzing similar time periods could not confirm these findings but reported instead no increased incidence of malignancy, neither in comparison with the general population nor in relation to DMT [ 13 , 14 ]. A recent meta-analysis with meta-regression by Papadopoulos et al found that treatment with DMT did not modify the risk of neoplasms in MS clinical trials from 1991 to 2020, which may reflect a low carcinogenic potential of DMTs and/or that the neoplasia latencies far exceed the typical MS trial observation periods [ 15 ]. 43.75% of our patients started or kept their MS therapy after tumor diagnosis, which might have been motivated by the concern of ongoing MS disease activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although Grytten et al reported an increased incidence of cancer among MS patients compared to controls for the time period from 1996 to 2017, corresponding in time to the introduction of DMT for MS, this effect has been observed predominantly among MS patients older than 60 years of age [ 12 ] and other studies analyzing similar time periods could not confirm these findings but reported instead no increased incidence of malignancy, neither in comparison with the general population nor in relation to DMT [ 13 , 14 ]. A recent meta-analysis with meta-regression by Papadopoulos et al found that treatment with DMT did not modify the risk of neoplasms in MS clinical trials from 1991 to 2020, which may reflect a low carcinogenic potential of DMTs and/or that the neoplasia latencies far exceed the typical MS trial observation periods [ 15 ]. 43.75% of our patients started or kept their MS therapy after tumor diagnosis, which might have been motivated by the concern of ongoing MS disease activity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%