2014
DOI: 10.1111/cns.12290
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease‐Modifying Anti‐Alzheimer's Drugs: Inhibitors of Human Cholinesterases Interfering with β‐Amyloid Aggregation

Abstract: Converging analytical, biological, and in silico data explained the mechanism of action of 2a on Aβ1-42 oligomers formation and against Aβ-preformed fibrils. This evidence, combined with toxicity data, will orient the future design of safer analogues.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
1
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dysregulation of the biosynthesis of acetylcholine neurotransmitter has been found in AD (Brogi et al 2014;Rosini et al 2014). Anti-acetylcholinesterases, which inhibit the action of the acetylcholinesterase enzyme that breaks down acetylcholine and increase the level, duration, and action of acetylcholine, have been suggested to improve learning and memory.…”
Section: Inhibitors and Modulators Of Neurotransmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dysregulation of the biosynthesis of acetylcholine neurotransmitter has been found in AD (Brogi et al 2014;Rosini et al 2014). Anti-acetylcholinesterases, which inhibit the action of the acetylcholinesterase enzyme that breaks down acetylcholine and increase the level, duration, and action of acetylcholine, have been suggested to improve learning and memory.…”
Section: Inhibitors and Modulators Of Neurotransmittersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is reported in the literature that the rearrangement of β‐strands lead to destabilization of Aβ 42 protofibril structure . As depicted in Figure a, the distance between A21 (chain A) and V36 (chain B) was significantly increased to ∼1.75 nm in Aβ 42 protofibril‐ C1 complex as compared to ∼1.20 nm in Aβ 42 protofibril.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 76%
“…For Aβ 42 protofibril, D23‐K28 interchain salt bridge distance remain close to ∼0.30 nm throughout simulation while the distance approaches ∼0.60 nm for Aβ 42 protofibril‐ C1 complex (Figure a‐b). Thus, C1 disrupt salt bridge interaction between chains A−B and hence cause destabilization of Aβ 42 protofibril structure, which is consistent with the reported studies …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technique was applied using the docking complexes obtained by means of Glide. The software was used to calculate the free-binding energy (DG bind ) of each ligand, as recently reported by us [32][33][34] .…”
Section: Prime/mm-gbsa Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%