2004
DOI: 10.1089/dis.2004.7.275
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease Management Interventions: What's in the Black Box?

Abstract: In discussing evaluation techniques to assess disease management (DM) program outcomes, it is often assumed that DM program interventions are premised on sound clinical judgment, an understanding of the disease process, and knowledge of the psychosocial models of behavioral change that must be used to effect those processes and ultimately improve the health outcomes that are being evaluated. This paper describes eight commonly used behavioral change models applied in the healthcare industry today. They represe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Much of this variability may be traced to programmatic differences in the targeted population, diseases covered, intervention strategies used to induce behavior change, means of identifying participants, intervention pathways, intensity of interaction with provider(s), outcome evaluation criteria, and degree of administrative control over program implementation. 4,5 Successful DM interventions are tailored to the unique needs and circumstances of a client's population. Understanding what motivates employees to participate in programs that will give them greater control over their health is receiving increased attention at a time when employers are attempting to hold down rising medical costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of this variability may be traced to programmatic differences in the targeted population, diseases covered, intervention strategies used to induce behavior change, means of identifying participants, intervention pathways, intensity of interaction with provider(s), outcome evaluation criteria, and degree of administrative control over program implementation. 4,5 Successful DM interventions are tailored to the unique needs and circumstances of a client's population. Understanding what motivates employees to participate in programs that will give them greater control over their health is receiving increased attention at a time when employers are attempting to hold down rising medical costs.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Behavioral Change Models Disease management programs were developed under the assumption that health services utilization and morbidity could be reduced for those with chronic illness by augmenting the traditional episodic medical care system with services and support between doctors' visits (Linden & Roberts, 2004). For many chronic diseases, much opportunity exists to improve the quality and consistency of care, such as regular tests of glucose control (HbAlc).…”
Section: Behavioral Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the behavioral models target all of the levels that are categorized under comprehensive models (Linden & Roberts, 2004). Figure 5.1 depicts the behavioral models used in different levels.…”
Section: Behavioral Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grol, Wensing, and Eccles recognize the marketing approach as one of several (e.g., educational, external influence, and social interaction approaches) used to implement clinical interventions [28]. Linden and Roberts note that social marketing is a comprehensive model--operating at the community, interpersonal, and individual levels--that shares goals and techniques with other healthcare behavioral change models [29]. The social marketing approach also is consistent with the empirically-based conceptual model for diffusion and dissemination of innovations in health services organizations recently proposed by Greenhalgh and colleagues [30].…”
Section: Social Marketing: Applying Marketing Techniques To Social Prmentioning
confidence: 99%