2007
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-48978-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease in Wild Animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

3
148
1
4

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 184 publications
(166 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
148
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Disease can have significant direct and indirect impacts on wildlife by affecting both mortality and fecundity rates (Wobeser, 2006). Determining disease dynamics such as annual or seasonal rates of transmission and associated demographic impacts in wildlife populations, however, presents significant ecologic and epidemiologic challenges (McCallum et al, 2001;Wobeser, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Disease can have significant direct and indirect impacts on wildlife by affecting both mortality and fecundity rates (Wobeser, 2006). Determining disease dynamics such as annual or seasonal rates of transmission and associated demographic impacts in wildlife populations, however, presents significant ecologic and epidemiologic challenges (McCallum et al, 2001;Wobeser, 2008).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Disease can have significant direct and indirect impacts on wildlife by affecting both mortality and fecundity rates (Wobeser, 2006). Determining disease dynamics such as annual or seasonal rates of transmission and associated demographic impacts in wildlife populations, however, presents significant ecologic and epidemiologic challenges (McCallum et al, 2001;Wobeser, 2008). Additionally, it can be especially difficult to determine whether pathogens indirectly affect recruitment of young animals into a population by affecting breeding success or behavior associated with caring for young (Wobeser, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Finding diseased or dead animals is the most direct evidence that disease is occurring in an area or population, but this technique has limited application and, invariably, results in an underestimation of the occurrence of disease (Wobeser, 2006). The number of submitted and reported animals is, therefore, not a good measurement of prevalence of disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feral swine (Sus scrofa) are a reservoir of diseases of domestic livestock and are a potential disease threat to livestock production (Wobeser, 2006). Worldwide, exposure rates to several pathogens, such as Mycobacterium bovis (Vicente et al, 2006), Type A influenza virus (Hall et al, 2008), pseudorabies virus (PRV; Campbell et al, 2008), and Brucella suis , can be high (30-80%).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%