2007
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.06-0971
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Disease Course of Patients with X-linked Retinitis Pigmentosa due toRPGRGene Mutations

Abstract: Patients with X-linked retinitis pigmentosa due to RPGR mutations lose visual acuity and visual field more rapidly than do patients with dominant retinitis pigmentosa due to RHO mutations.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

19
135
3
2

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 134 publications
(159 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
19
135
3
2
Order By: Relevance
“…18 Despite a broad overlap in phenotype between RP patients with RPGR mutations, previous study showed that patients with mutation in exons 1-14 had a smaller visual filed area, lower ERG amplitude and lost ERG amplitude 50% greater than those with ORF15 mutations. 37,38 In contrast to these studies, subject 4 with ORF11 mutation had milder AO-SLO features, in terms of both quantity and quality, along with better ERG amplitude than subjects 1 and 5 who had ORF15 mutations, even subject 4 was older and high myopia. Although this result showed that the AO-SLO finding well matched with ERG, proving sensitivity of AO-SLO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…18 Despite a broad overlap in phenotype between RP patients with RPGR mutations, previous study showed that patients with mutation in exons 1-14 had a smaller visual filed area, lower ERG amplitude and lost ERG amplitude 50% greater than those with ORF15 mutations. 37,38 In contrast to these studies, subject 4 with ORF11 mutation had milder AO-SLO features, in terms of both quantity and quality, along with better ERG amplitude than subjects 1 and 5 who had ORF15 mutations, even subject 4 was older and high myopia. Although this result showed that the AO-SLO finding well matched with ERG, proving sensitivity of AO-SLO.…”
mentioning
confidence: 69%
“…4,5 Males carrying RPGR mutations typically show signs of night blindness and restriction of visual fields in their first or second decade of life, and the disease often progresses to nearly complete vision loss in the fourth or fifth decade. [6][7][8] Female carriers are usually not affected, but can occasionally exhibit electroretinogram (ERG) defects. 6,9,10 The RPGR gene uses alternative splicing sites and polyadenylation signals producing multiple transcript variants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, in the present study, there was no attempt to target the very central retina; the extracentral subretinal approach as used in the dogs would be the advisable strategy for early phase human clinical trials on the basis of the current observations. However, many RPGR patients show continued survival of foveal cones and impaired but useful visual acuity in late disease stages (15). Because subfoveal injections of viral vector constructs have been shown to cause loss of diseased foveal cones (50), an alternate means of therapeutic gene delivery should be considered.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Males affected with RPGR-XLRP typically have night blindness in their first decade of life followed by reduction of their visual field and loss of visual acuity. By the end of their fourth decade, most patients are legally blind (14)(15)(16).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%