1969
DOI: 10.1680/iicep.1969.7388
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion. The Theory of the Strip Method for the Design of Slabs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One approach to tackle flat slabs on irregular column layout is to consider strong bands along column lines [7]. These strong bands function as beams hidden inside slab panels.…”
Section: Design Methods Based On "Safe" Lower Bound Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…One approach to tackle flat slabs on irregular column layout is to consider strong bands along column lines [7]. These strong bands function as beams hidden inside slab panels.…”
Section: Design Methods Based On "Safe" Lower Bound Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wood and Armer proposed the following equilibrium system as an alternative to Hillerborg's dvanced strip method [7]. Fig.…”
Section: Wood and Armer's Solution To Flat Slabmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various other influence curves by Morice and Little (1954), and Pucher (1964) Armer, 1969) noted that the strip method could be thought of as being similar to a torsion-less grillage method. The grillage method became more popular after the publication of Bridge Deck analysis by Hambly (1976), and by its second edition (Hambly, 1991, which interestingly reintroduced the torsion-less grillage) found grillage analysis the standard method in all bridge design offices.…”
Section: Historic Perspectivementioning
confidence: 96%
“…Strip Method:-Is introduced by (Hilleborg, 1956) and developed by (Wood & Armer, 1968) is also based on the assumption that reinforced concrete slabs behave plastically. However, the strip method, unlike yield line analysis, provides a lower bound on the collapse load.…”
Section: ( )mentioning
confidence: 99%