1978
DOI: 10.1680/geot.1978.28.1.125
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion: Plastic deformation and failure in granular media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where θ A is the shear band angle calculated by Arthur et al [36]. Table 3 indicates that the shear band slopes of the NC1, NC2, OC1, and OC2 were 52.1 • , 49.6 • , 51.7 • , and 52.3 • , respectively, in the softening stage, which is similar to θ R that considers the dilatation angle of the soil.…”
Section: Shear Band Characteristics: Angle and Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 57%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…where θ A is the shear band angle calculated by Arthur et al [36]. Table 3 indicates that the shear band slopes of the NC1, NC2, OC1, and OC2 were 52.1 • , 49.6 • , 51.7 • , and 52.3 • , respectively, in the softening stage, which is similar to θ R that considers the dilatation angle of the soil.…”
Section: Shear Band Characteristics: Angle and Thicknesssupporting
confidence: 57%
“…In the softening stage, the shear band slopes of both clays were similar to that of Roscoe [35]. In the steady-state stage, the slope of the final shear band was between those of Mohr-Coulomb and Arthur et al [36] for the NC clay and similar to that of Arthur et al [36] for the OC clay. This indicates that the dilatation angle mainly influences the softening stage when the shear band is continuously developing and that the internal friction angle influences the steady-state stage when the shear band slope is gradually increasing.…”
supporting
confidence: 62%
See 1 more Smart Citation