Discussion on the Network Literacy Education System of College Students under the Big Data Media Management Model

Abstract

Quality is strengthened by one’s own efforts in continuous learning. Quality education is a requirement for enhancing comprehensive national power. In a sense, it is of great significance to carry out quality education for college students, improve national quality, cultivate innovative talents, and ensure the quality of national and innovative talents, which is a prerequisite for social development. Quality education is the requirement of education reform in higher vocational colleges. Since entering the 21st century, many higher education institutions have slowly changed from elite education to mass education and from professional education in the past to professional education and quality education at the same time. This paper focuses on the study of college students’ network quality education system under the big data media management mode, using SQL Server big data management system, Oracle big data analysis research, and related score evaluation method to make an overall analysis of the current situation of China’s college students’ network quality education, and on this basis, we propose to improve academic standards, improve teachers’ quality education ability, follow academic freedom and equality, and improve the suggestions of improving academic standards, improving teachers’ quality education ability, following academic freedom and equality, improving teacher appointment system, optimizing evaluation system of quality education results, innovating incentive mechanism of university teachers’ online quality education, and creating benign development system of university teachers’ online quality education are proposed.

Retracted: Discussion on the Network Literacy Education System of College Students under the Big Data Media Management Model

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”