2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11589-012-0848-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion on moment tensor solution and seismogenic structure of Ruichang-Yangxin earthquake on 10 September 2011

Abstract: Ruichang-Yangxin earthquake is another moderate earthquake in Yangxin-Jiujiang area since 2005 Jiujiang-Ruichang M 5.7 earthquake. In order to more understand the seismic activities in this area, we study the moment tensor solution and the seismogenic structure of the Ruichang-Yangxin earthquake. Precise earthquake relocation shows that the mainshock occurred on the southwestern part of the NE-trending fault and aftershocks are distributed not only along the NE-trending fault but also along its conjugated NW-t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In particular, the horizontal relocation errors in the longitudedirection generated by the R2 velocity model were far smaller than the vertical relocation errors. The relocation errors generated by the velocity models from Lü et al (2019), Song et al (2019), Huang et al (2006), and PE in CRUST2.0 were similar. Shown in Figure 8 is summary of the spatial distributions of aftershocks (the epicenters are the averages from the eight relocation results), with the relocation results color-coded by maximum and minimum depths (Figures 8A,B) and horizontal and vertical ranges (Figures 8C,D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In particular, the horizontal relocation errors in the longitudedirection generated by the R2 velocity model were far smaller than the vertical relocation errors. The relocation errors generated by the velocity models from Lü et al (2019), Song et al (2019), Huang et al (2006), and PE in CRUST2.0 were similar. Shown in Figure 8 is summary of the spatial distributions of aftershocks (the epicenters are the averages from the eight relocation results), with the relocation results color-coded by maximum and minimum depths (Figures 8A,B) and horizontal and vertical ranges (Figures 8C,D).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Below this region, approximately half of the shocks are at depths greater than 10 km; while above this region, the M L 1-3 shocks are at depths of 11-30 km. The hypocentral depths obtained using the DD relocation algorithm with the velocity model of Song et al (2019) are relatively shallow overall (basically less than 20 km) (Figure 4D), perhaps because this velocity model reflects influences from some localized structures. Specifically, the majority of the M L 1-3 shocks are relocated at depths shallower than 17 km.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation