1911
DOI: 10.1061/taceat.0002320
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion on Dams on Sand Foundations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These features (the particle size decreases gradually from coarse to fine from apex to apron) reflect the facies architecture developed during their evolution and formed due to the change of hydrodynamic conditions [17][18][19]. As observed previously, the particle size of fans normally reflects the permeability of the sediment, and many empirical formulas have been founded based on the relationship between particle size and K [20,21]. The coarser particle size, the larger the K. For example, K of the alluvial fan aquifer in the northwest of the Hetao basin decreases from 2.0 m/d along the mountain front to 0.2 m/d in the downdip region [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…These features (the particle size decreases gradually from coarse to fine from apex to apron) reflect the facies architecture developed during their evolution and formed due to the change of hydrodynamic conditions [17][18][19]. As observed previously, the particle size of fans normally reflects the permeability of the sediment, and many empirical formulas have been founded based on the relationship between particle size and K [20,21]. The coarser particle size, the larger the K. For example, K of the alluvial fan aquifer in the northwest of the Hetao basin decreases from 2.0 m/d along the mountain front to 0.2 m/d in the downdip region [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The liquefaction threshold suggested by Turner and Nielsen (1997) (Equation 1) is based on the concept of critical fluid velocity driven by a pressure gradient according to Darcy's law (Holtz & Kovacs, 1981). The hydraulic conductivity for this calculation was based on the Hazen equation ()K=0.01D102 $\left(K=0.01{D}_{10}^{2}\right)$, using a D 10 of 0.17 mm (Hazen, 1911). According to the Turner and Nielsen threshold, no momentary liquefaction events were recorded between sensors P77a‐b or P77b‐c during the shown time period (Figure 8).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effective porosity ( n e [−]) of the sand was measured using the imbibition method (Collins, 1961), arriving at an average value of 0.38. The freshwater hydraulic conductivity of the sand, K , was obtained through Darcy column testing and grain‐size analysis based on the empirical equation proposed by Hazen (1911). Darcy column tests produced K = 1,362 ± 68 m/d (based on repeated tests), while Hazen's (1911) equation provided K = 1,286 m/d, with a possible range of 1,183 to1394 m/d, considering reasonable variability in input parameters (i.e., ±0.05 mm for d 10 ) and 1.0 for the Hazen's empirical coefficient (the sand is well sorted).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%