2006
DOI: 10.1520/jte12577
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion on “A Study on the Beginning of Secondary Compression of Soils” by R. G. Robinson

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some protostars show an obvious self-absorbed silicate feature at 10 µm (e.g., IRAS 04154+2823, 04181+2654 B; see Fig. 2d), where the silicate emission from inner disk regions is absorbed in cooler envelope regions, causing a feature that is more or less flat, with some emission and some absorption characteristics (Mitchell & Robinson 1981). The self-absorbed features probably indicate that the optical depth of the envelope along the line of sight is not as large as for the cases where a clear silicate absorption feature is seen.…”
Section: Irs Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some protostars show an obvious self-absorbed silicate feature at 10 µm (e.g., IRAS 04154+2823, 04181+2654 B; see Fig. 2d), where the silicate emission from inner disk regions is absorbed in cooler envelope regions, causing a feature that is more or less flat, with some emission and some absorption characteristics (Mitchell & Robinson 1981). The self-absorbed features probably indicate that the optical depth of the envelope along the line of sight is not as large as for the cases where a clear silicate absorption feature is seen.…”
Section: Irs Spectramentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a direct consequence of SK07 incorporating dust self-absorption in their models, an effect assigned to increasing quantities of dust at low temperatures (e.g. Mitchell & Robinson 1981), resulting in an overall shift of the far-IR peak to longer wavelengths. Our photometry misses the silicate feature so we cannot constrain its depth; nevertheless its varied strength in the models is consistent with observations as it is commonly found in LIRG & ULIRG spectra (e.g.…”
Section: Model Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 7; Alexander et al 2003), which was found to be due to hot, optically thin silicate emission being extinguished by cool, optically thin silicate absorption. Such a combination of silicate emission and absorption is a common interpretation for the relatively flat spectra found in YSOs (Mitchell & Robinson 1981;Furlan et al 2008). Alternatively, the peaks at 9.2 and 11.3 μm may be due to crystalline silicates which are also commonly seen in YSOs (Olofsson et al 2009).…”
Section: Spitzer Irs Spectrummentioning
confidence: 88%