2008
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-89694-4_36
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion of Offspring Generation Method for Interactive Genetic Algorithms with Consideration of Multimodal Preference

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work is close to the works developed by Ito et al [10], Llora et al [12] and Kagawa et al [11]. Ito et al [10] considered multimodal preference within IGA but did not considered neither dependencies among design variables nor fitness modeling during evolution. Llora et al [12] used support vector machines to synthesize a fitness model based on user evaluation.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 76%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our work is close to the works developed by Ito et al [10], Llora et al [12] and Kagawa et al [11]. Ito et al [10] considered multimodal preference within IGA but did not considered neither dependencies among design variables nor fitness modeling during evolution. Llora et al [12] used support vector machines to synthesize a fitness model based on user evaluation.…”
Section: Related Worksupporting
confidence: 76%
“…But, the user has to evaluate each individual in every generation. For example, if IGA evolves 20 generations with populations of 20 individuals (as it is proposed in their paper [10]), the user should carry out 400 evaluations. Then, the bad point is given by the human tedium and fatigue caused in the evaluation process.…”
Section: Finding the Optimal Image With Igamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations