2002
DOI: 10.1109/tpwrs.2002.1008377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion of "Analysis of load frequency control performance assessment criteria" [and closure]

Abstract: George Gross and Jeong Woo Lee [University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign]: We welcome the comments and questions of Jaleeli and VanSlyck and appreciate their interest in our work. We begin our response by reiterating the importance with which we view the pioneering work of the discussers [6], [7] and the key role this work played in the research reported in this paper. At the outset, we also need to emphasize that the aim of our paper was to provide a firm analytical basis for the formulation, analysis, and … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Gross and Lee (2001) attempted to give a more general mathematical framework for the two criteria and also came to a conclusion that the CPS2 is redundant under certain conditions if the CPS1 is satisfied. However, Jaleeli and VanSlyck (2002) do not agree with this result and suggest that without the CPS2 criterion the RMS of all averages of frequency error could grow even further. In addition, Jaleeli and VanSlyck (1999) suggested to use a modified CPS2 in the sense that minute-averages were replaced by houraverages which could be more practical than requiring more rapid and costly control to meet ten-minute targets.…”
Section: Existing Control Performance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…Gross and Lee (2001) attempted to give a more general mathematical framework for the two criteria and also came to a conclusion that the CPS2 is redundant under certain conditions if the CPS1 is satisfied. However, Jaleeli and VanSlyck (2002) do not agree with this result and suggest that without the CPS2 criterion the RMS of all averages of frequency error could grow even further. In addition, Jaleeli and VanSlyck (1999) suggested to use a modified CPS2 in the sense that minute-averages were replaced by houraverages which could be more practical than requiring more rapid and costly control to meet ten-minute targets.…”
Section: Existing Control Performance Criteriamentioning
confidence: 65%
“…During the investigation of multi area system, the focus has been to optimize the integral controller gain using various performance index methods like Integral Time Square Error (ITSE), Integral Square Error (ISE) and Integral Absolute Time Error (IATE) [6], [7], [10]. In a multi area power system the load disturbance occurs in the system either in an area for this study is considered, 1% of step load disturbance occurs Area1 (Thermal area).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%