1996
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9410(1996)122:6(505)
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion: Collapse of Saturated Soil Due to Reduction in Confinement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…6b). The results for the undrained creep tests in the CSD stress path presented by Santos et al (1996) demonstrated that for the Soberbo residual soil during the undrained creep period, the soil stress path moves away from the soil failure envelope. The results for the drained creep tests shown in Figs.…”
Section: Drained Creep Tests (Dc-csd)mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…6b). The results for the undrained creep tests in the CSD stress path presented by Santos et al (1996) demonstrated that for the Soberbo residual soil during the undrained creep period, the soil stress path moves away from the soil failure envelope. The results for the drained creep tests shown in Figs.…”
Section: Drained Creep Tests (Dc-csd)mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The results of triaxial tests with failure induced by increasing the pore pressure have been reported by different researchers. Brenner et al (1985), Santos et al (1996), Zhu and Anderson (1998), Tsukamoto (2002), Ng and Petley (2009); Junaideen et al (2010) performed tests in residual soils. Test results in colluvial soils have been reported by Anderson and Riemer (1995), Anderson and Sitar (1995), Dai et al (1999a and b).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This latter behaviour could be considered surprising, since the same soil showed a contractant behaviour in anisotropically consolidated undrained compression (CAU) tests, with an ultimate deviatoric stress generally smaller than the initial deviatoric stress (Anderson & Sitar, 1995). A similar behaviour was observed by Santos et al (1996) on a residual soil from Soberbo Road, Rio de Janeiro, questioning the relevance of CAU tests for evaluating contractancy±dilatancy behaviour after failure.…”
Section: Frictional Energymentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The importance of this aspect has been evidenced by work by Anderson & Riemer (1995), Anderson & Sitar (1995) and Santos et al (1996) in relation to slides induced by pore pressure increase. Indeed, most laboratory tests are performed in compression or in extension, whereas in situ behaviour corresponds to a decrease in effective mean stress under an approximately constant shear stress.…”
Section: Frictional Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation