2017
DOI: 10.1080/1554480x.2017.1411263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussion-based pedagogy through the eyes of Chinese international exchange students

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This could be explained by the different sample used in this study. Former studies primarily involved preuniversity EFL teachers, while the respondents of this study were tertiary-level EFL instructors working with language students who had longer years of English instruction, a higher level of maturity, learning autonomy, and motivation (Jackson & Chen, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This could be explained by the different sample used in this study. Former studies primarily involved preuniversity EFL teachers, while the respondents of this study were tertiary-level EFL instructors working with language students who had longer years of English instruction, a higher level of maturity, learning autonomy, and motivation (Jackson & Chen, 2018).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SAGE Open EFL teachers' cultural background was proposed as one of the main barriers for them to adopt indirect or metalinguistic strategies that demand students to study teachers' comments, identify, and revise their errors. However, in higher education, many recent studies targeting adult learners in Asian countries (e.g., Hyland, 2004;Jackson & Chen, 2018;Tran, 2007) have challenged the stereotypical view of Asian learners being passive, shy, and less motivated by providing empirical evidence to show that Asian learners can actively engage with feedback from both teachers and peers (Man et al, 2017). Therefore, it can be assumed that university students in the Asian context could have the willingness to engage with teacher feedback on their written assignments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Educational researchers have been investigating student participation in class discussion for decades. The reasons for lack of participation are varied: Some students are naturally quiet and introverted (Medaille & Usinger, 2019); some students do not view their ideas as worthy of sharing (Wade, 1994); some fear they will make a mistake in front of their instructor and peers (Engin, 2017); others experience barriers due to mental health issues or disability status (Marquis et al, 2016); still others are multilingual learners who, although perhaps confident in their ideas, may not be confident in their ability to express those ideas in the dominant language of the classroom (Chew & Ng, 2015;Jackson & Chen, 2018;Yazici & Bavli, 2022). Classes that rely heavily on discussion-based learning may privilege extroverted, outgoing Fleming Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, Vol.…”
Section: Barriers To Discussion Participationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many Chinese educators have demonstrated resistance and reluctance to adapting their English teaching theories and pedagogies, and grammar translation remains the major teaching strategy, which despite its cultural congruity, "has failed to develop an adequate level of communicative competence, i.e., the ability to use the target language for authentic communication" (Hu, 2002). It is reported that Chinese students seem to find it challenging to suspend their beliefs to engage in learning activities and feel uneasy in a more democratic communicative learning environment (Hu, 2002;Jackson & Chen, 2018). Liu (2016) argues that in order to achieve sustained English learning, not only students need to be convinced that ESP (English with reference to specific terminology and skills) is important for them, but also educators require to develop courses that are interesting and enjoyable (Liu, 2016).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%