2012
DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-5812.2010.00732.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discussing Controversial Issues in the Classroom

Abstract: Discussion is widely held to be the pedagogical approach most appropriate to the exploration of controversial issues in the classroom, but surprisingly little attention has been given to the questions of why it is the preferred approach and how best to facilitate it. Here we address ourselves to both questions. We begin by clarifying the concept of discussion and justifying it as an approach to the teaching of controversial issues. We then report on a recent empirical study of the Perspectives on Science AS‐le… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
49
0
10

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
49
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The example shares this feature with much of the literature on the teaching of controversial issues. As Hand and Levinson have noted, discussion is widely considered the pedagogical approach ‘most appropriate to the exploration of controversial issues in the classroom’, perhaps so much so that ‘surprisingly little attention has been given to the questions of why it is the preferred approach and how best to facilitate it’ (Hand and Levinson, , p. 614).…”
Section: Making the Case: Practical Bearings Of Situationismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The example shares this feature with much of the literature on the teaching of controversial issues. As Hand and Levinson have noted, discussion is widely considered the pedagogical approach ‘most appropriate to the exploration of controversial issues in the classroom’, perhaps so much so that ‘surprisingly little attention has been given to the questions of why it is the preferred approach and how best to facilitate it’ (Hand and Levinson, , p. 614).…”
Section: Making the Case: Practical Bearings Of Situationismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many SSI are controversial, which means that contrary, yet well-reasoned, views could be held on the issues. Hence, the teacher cannot provide all the answers in discussions on SSI (Hand and Levinson 2012). Consequently, SSI offer opportunities for the teacher and the students to be positioned in alternative ways compared to conveyor and recipients of knowledge.…”
Section: Positioning Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In spite of the democratic mission of schooling, research shows that many teachers avoid addressing issues they think may be controversial or cause strong emotions in the classroom. Many teachers also report being unsure about how to address potentially controversial issues in their teaching [15][16][17][18]. This ambiguity of the situation may be grounded in teachers' lack of knowledge and/or uncertainty about how to address such questions in a constructive and educationally productive way.…”
Section: Controversial Issues In Teachingmentioning
confidence: 99%