1999
DOI: 10.28998/0103-6858.1999n23p91-111
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Discurso, imprensa e reprodução da discriminação

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although criticized by radical feminist opponents as a "measure supporting pimps", the bill in fact restricted the amount of surplus that could be extracted from third party sex work, and would have been the first law ever in Brazilian history to set strict limits on employers financial exploitation of workers of any sort. More importantly, the bill would have cleared the way for sex worker-owned and -operated collectives in Brazil's sexual commercial economy, as well as retirement, health, and safety benefits for sex workers under Brazil's existing labor laws 2 (for more information on the history of Davida, see Leite 2009;Magalhães 1987;Murray 2013Murray , 2015Skackauskas 2012;Strack 1996).…”
Section: Davida (Re)enters the Anti-trafficking Debatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although criticized by radical feminist opponents as a "measure supporting pimps", the bill in fact restricted the amount of surplus that could be extracted from third party sex work, and would have been the first law ever in Brazilian history to set strict limits on employers financial exploitation of workers of any sort. More importantly, the bill would have cleared the way for sex worker-owned and -operated collectives in Brazil's sexual commercial economy, as well as retirement, health, and safety benefits for sex workers under Brazil's existing labor laws 2 (for more information on the history of Davida, see Leite 2009;Magalhães 1987;Murray 2013Murray , 2015Skackauskas 2012;Strack 1996).…”
Section: Davida (Re)enters the Anti-trafficking Debatementioning
confidence: 99%